Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis Xiv
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1989)
This book analyses the concept of scientific explanation developed by French disciples of Descartes in the period 1660-1700. Clarke examines the views of authors such as Malebranche and Rohault, as well as those of less well-known authors such as Cordemoy, Gadroys, Poisson and R'egis. These Cartesian natural philosophers developed an understanding of scientific explanation as necessarily hypothetical, and, while they contributed little to new scientific discoveries, they made a lasting contribution to our concept of explanation--generations of scientists in subsequent centuries followed their lead.
|Keywords||Science, Medieval Philosophy Explanation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$74.10 used (18% off) $211.42 new Amazon page|
|Call number||Q174.8.C57 1989|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Franz‐Peter Griesmaier (2005). Kitcher‐Style Unificationism and Explanatory Relevance. Dialectica 59 (1):37-50.
Martin Bell (1997). Hume and Causal Power: The Influences of Malebranche and Newton. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1):67 – 86.
Alexander Douglas (2015). Was Spinoza a Naturalist? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):77-99.
Timo Kaitaro (2008). Can Matter Mark the Hours? Eighteenth-Century Vitalist Materialism and Functional Properties. Science in Context 21 (4):581.
Simon Boag (2011). Explanation in Personality Psychology: “Verbal Magic” and the Five-Factor Model. Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):223-243.
Similar books and articles
Peter Lipton (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
I. A. Omer (1970). On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):417-433.
Edward MacKinnon (1978). The Development of Kant's Conception of Scientific Explanation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:18 - 30.
Edward Grant (2010). The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Catholic University of America Press.
C. E. Cleland (2011). Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):551-582.
Richard L. Purtill (1971). Toulmin on Ideals of Natural Order. Synthese 22 (3-4):431 - 437.
Deborah J. Brown (2012). Cartesian Functional Analysis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):75 - 92.
Richard Swinburne (1990). The Limits of Explanation. Philosophy 27 (Supplement):177 - 193.
Nicholas Jolley (1990). Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV. Philosophical Books 31 (3):144-146.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?