David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The first question concerns a fundamental assumption of most researchers who theorize about the brain. Do neural systems exploit classical compositional and systematic representations, distributed representations, or no representations at all? The question is not easily answered. Connectionism, for example, has been criticised for both holding and challenging representational views. The second quesútion concerns the crucial methodological issue of how results emerging from the various brain sciences can help to constrain cognitive scientific models. Finally, the third question focuses attention on a major challenge to contemporary cognitive science: the challenge of understanding the mind as a controller of embodied and environmentally embedded action.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andy Clark (1999). An Embodied Cognitive Science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9):345-351.
William P. Bechtel (1986). What Happens to Accounts of Mind-Brain Relations If We Forgo an Architecture of Rules and Representations? Philosophy of Science Association 1986:159 - 171.
Rick Grush (2003). In Defense of Some "Cartesian" Assumption Concerning the Brain and its Operation. Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):53-92.
Daniel Durstewitz (2006). Engineering the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):76-77.
Jay Schulkin (2006). Cognitive Functions, Bodily Sensibility and the Brain. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):341-349.
Colin Martindale (2000). Localist Representations Are a Desirable Emergent Property of Neurologically Plausible Neural Networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):485-486.
Friedrich T. Sommer & Pentti Kanerva (2006). Can Neural Models of Cognition Benefit From the Advantages of Connectionism? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):86-87.
Andy Clark & Chris Eliasmith (2002). Philosophical Issues in Brain Theory and Connectionism. In Michael A. Arbib (ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Second Edition. Mit Press.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). Refocusing the Question: Can There Be Skillful Coping Without Propositional Representations or Brain Representations? [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (4):413-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads88 ( #17,724 of 1,410,533 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #22,859 of 1,410,533 )
How can I increase my downloads?