Oxford University Press (2003)
|Abstract||Listening closely to the religious pitch in Rousseau's voice, Cladis convincingly shows that Rousseau, when attempting to portray the most characteristic aspects of the public and private, reached for a religious vocabulary. Honoring both love of self and love of that which is larger than the self--these twin poles, with all the tension between them--mark Rousseau's work, vision and challenge--the challenge of 21st-century democracy.|
|Keywords||Democracy Privacy Public interest Religion and politics|
|Buy the book||$2.00 new (98% off) $6.00 used (93% off) $80.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||JC179.R9.C53 2003|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edmund F. Byrne (2010). Why and How Secular Society Should Accommodate Religion: A Philosophical Proposal. Edwin Mellen Press.
Joseph Femia (1996). Complexity and Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):359 – 397.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Amy L. Fairchild, Ronald Bayer & James Colgrove (2008). Privacy, Democracy and the Politics of Disease Surveillance. Public Health Ethics 1 (1):30-38.
Serge Grigoriev (2011). Rorty, Religion, and Humanism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):187-201.
Ian O.’Flynn (2010). Deliberating About the Public Interest. Res Publica 16 (3):299-315.
Matthew Weinshall (2003). Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas's Theory of Democracy. Critical Review 15 (1-2):23-58.
Mark S. Cladis (1993). Rousseau and Durkheim: The Relation Between the Public and the Private. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):1 - 25.
Mark S. Cladis (2000). Redeeming Love: Rousseau and Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):221 - 251.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,252 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,252 )
How can I increase my downloads?