David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:151 - 164 (1976)
Descartes' methodology is ambiguous about the role of empirical evidence in science. This ambiguity does not derive from Rationalist qualms about the specifically empirical character of such evidence; for the apparant clash of experience and reason is explained by the need to re-interpret perceptions in terms of new theories, and by the frequently "contaminated" status of so-called experimental evidence. The ambiguity results, rather, from: (a) Descartes' predilection for "ordinary experience" rather than experiments as a source of warrant, and (b) the looseness of fit between hypotheses and confirming evidence. The mathematical ideal of science is a camouflage for a naive, and conceptually impoverished, empiricism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steven Gimbel (2004). Restoring Ambiguity to Achinstein's Account of Evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.
Athanasios Raftopoulos (2011). Ambiguous Figures and Representationalism. Synthese 181 (3):489-514.
Paul A. Roth (2007). The Disappearance of the Empirical: Some Reflections on Contemporary Culture Theory and Historiography. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):271-292.
Fiona Macpherson (2006). Ambiguous Figures and the Content of Experience. Noûs 40 (1):82-117.
Adam B. Seligman (2012). Rethinking Pluralism: Ritual, Experience, and Ambiguity. Oxford University Press.
Roger E. Backhouse & Matthias Klaes (2009). Applying Economics, Using Evidence. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):139-144.
Louis Caruana (2009). The Force of Counter-Evidence in Science and Religion. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):361-374.
Anya Plutynski (2011). In Defense of Rationalist Science. In William Krieger (ed.), Science at the Frontiers: Perspectives on the History and Philosophy of Science.
Adam la Caze (2011). The Role of Basic Science in Evidence-Based Medicine. Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):81-98.
Emily Grosholz (2007). Representation and Productive Ambiguity in Mathematics and the Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Athanasse Raftopoulos (1995). Was Cartesian Science Ever Meant to Be a Priori? A Comment on Hatfield. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):150-160.
Manuel de Pinedo García & Hilan Nissor Bensusan (2012). Sense and Sensibility Educated: A Note on Experience and (Minimal) Empiricism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):741-747.
Michael Devitt (2006). Intuitions in Linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.
Gregor Schiemann (2007). Contexts of Nature According to Aristotle and Descartes. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:65-71.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #234,982 of 1,100,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,012 of 1,100,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?