The Commodification of Care
Hypatia 26 (1):43-64 (2011)
| Abstract | This paper discusses the question whether care work for dependent persons (children, the elderly, and disabled persons) may be entrusted to the market; that is, whether and to what extent there is a normative justification for the “commodification of care.” It first proposes a capability theory for care that raises two relevant demands: a basic capability for receiving care and a capability for giving care. Next it discusses and rejects two objections that aim to show that market-based care undermines the caring motives essential to care, one of them because of its reliance on contracts and the other because of the corrupting influence of payment on motivation. If market care is in principle legitimate, the commodification question transforms into one about the appropriate combinations of market and non-market care. This question can be answered only by adding an additional complication: care is to be balanced against other activities, most notably work for the labor market. This brings in the problem of gender inequality, since paid work has been traditionally distributed to men and caring activities to women. I show how the capability theory of caring presented in this paper can help resolve the dispute between competing models for balancing work and caring | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesM. Cathleen Kaveny (1999). Commodifying the Polyvalent Good of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):207 – 223.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1999). The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift From a Professional to a Market Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):243 – 266.
Monique Lanoix (2009). Shades of Gray: From Caring to Uncaring Labor. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (2).
Virginia Held (2002). Care and the Extension of Markets. Hypatia 17 (2):19-33.
Matthew Noah Smith (forthcoming). The Importance of What They Care About. Philosophical Studies.
Friedrich Heubel (2000). Patients or Customers: Ethical Limits of Market Economy in Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):240 – 253.
Tove Pettersen (2011). Conceptions of Care: Altruism, Feminism, and Mature Care. Hypatia 27 (2):366-389.
Nicki Hedge & Alison Mackenzie (2012). Beyond Care? Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (2):192-206.
Linda Zagzebski (2004). Epistemic Value and the Primacy of What We Care About. Philosophical Papers 33 (3):353-377.
Howard J. Curzer (1993). Is Care a Virtue for Health Care Professionals? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):51-69.
Elin Palm (2013). Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care. Health Care Analysis 21 (2):171-188.
Donnie J. Self (1991). Separating Care and Cure: An Analysis of Historical and Contemporary Images of Nursing and Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3).
Lijun Yuan (2008). A Balance of Justice and Care. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:487-493.
Daniel Engster (2005). Rethinking Care Theory: The Practice of Caring and the Obligation to Care. Hypatia 20 (3):50-74.
Fiona Robinson (2011). The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Temple University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-30Total downloads20 ( #61,563 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
