The Covenant with All Living Creatures
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Mark J. Cartledge & David Mills (eds.), Covenant Theology: Contemporary Approaches (2002)
Philosophers are usually expected to argue only from premises acceptable to a secular audience, in ways that require no special commitment beyond that to the value of argument itself. As a philosopher, I see no particular reason to deny myself the opportunity to argue from other, more `sectarian', premises, in ways now unfamiliar to an unbelieving nation. In so doing I may (as theistical philosophers often do) sound more traditional than many theologians
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Carolyn R. Morillo (1995). Contingent Creatures: Reward Event Theory of Motivation. Rowman & Littlefield.
Fred Ablondi (1998). Automata, Living and Non-Living: Descartes' Mechanical Biology and His Criteria for Life. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):179-186.
Dunja Jaber (2000). Human Dignity and the Dignity of Creatures. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):29-42.
Brooke Alan Trisel (2007). Judging Life and Its Value. Sorites (18):60-75.
David Owens (2008). Deliberation and the First Person. In Anthony E. Hatzimoysis (ed.), Self-Knowledge. Oxford University Press
Douglas C. Long (1994). Why Machines Can Neither Think nor Feel. In Dale W. Jamieson (ed.), Language, Mind and Art. Kluwer
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #228,010 of 1,725,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?