David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):54-74 (2010)
The origin of the Neoplatonist doctrine of the henads has been imputed to Iamblichus, mostly on indirect evidence found in later Neoplatonists, chiefly Proclus. Is there any trace of this concept to be found in the extant works or fragments of Iamblichus himself? The best candidates among his surviving texts are the excerpts in Psellus of his volume on Theological Arithmetic from his Pythagorean series, and the first book of de Mysteriis , where Iamblichus answers Porphyry's questions on the nature of the gods. Such evidence as can be found there would most likely deal with the divine henads, given the subject matter of the text. Certain repeated items of vocabulary appear as technical usages that form the basis for arguing that Iamblichus already has in mind if not the explicit concept henad at least its functional equivalent: the term monoeides occurring in both the Psellan excerpts and de Mysteriis, and in the latter, mostly in Book I, the stated attributes of a high, divine principle uniting the gods which are also designated by Proclus as typical of the divine henads, particularly in the propositions of the Elements of Theology defining the henads. Iamblichus in Book I also ascribes to the gods the same role in the process of ellampsis as Proclus does for the divine henads. A theory is also advanced concerning the possible development of the concept of the henad by Iamblichus, based in part on the polemical nature of de Mysteriis and his relationship to Porphyry
|Keywords||Syrianus Gods Iamblichus de Mysteriis Proclus Pythagorean Marsilio Ficino One Existent monoeides Akrotes/Summit ellampsis/Illumination Porphyry Elements of Theology The Good Theological Arithmetic Psellus Henad Participation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John M. Dillon (1972). Iamblichus and the Origin of the Doctrine of Henads. Phronesis 17 (2):102 - 106.
Henry J. Blumenthal & E. Gillian Clark (1993). Introduction : Iamblichus in 1990. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
Pamela M. Huby (1993). Priscian of Lydia as Evidence for Iamblichus. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
Mark J. Edwards (1993). Two Images of Pythagoras : Iamblichus and Porphyry. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
Dennis C. Clark (2008). Iamblichus' Egyptian Neoplatonic Theology in de Mysteriis. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):164-205.
Anne Sheppard (1993). Iamblichus on Inspiration : De Mysteriis 3.4-. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
Andrew Smith (1993). Iamblichus' Views on the Relationship of Philosophy to Religion in de Mysteriis. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
John Dillon (1993). Iamblichus and Henads Again. In H. J. Blumenthal & Gillian Clark (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol Classical Press
John M. Dillon (1972). Iamblichus and the Origin of the Doctrine of Henads. Phronesis 17 (2):102-106.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads29 ( #119,062 of 1,781,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #108,213 of 1,781,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?