David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 41 (01):257- (1991)
This comes near to satisfying; but even with ipsa the change of subject from tecta to plaustra is awkward, and exsultant is inappropriate to a lumbering plaustrum . I suggest reading cisia instead of ipsa. The cisium was a fast light two-wheeled vehicle which might well jump up on a rough road; and the first three letters cis could have become the -es of the MS exsultantes. Two further points: lapis uiai is not ‘a stone on the road’ , but rather the stone of the road, i.e. the paving; and utrimque is not ‘on one side or the other’ but ‘on both sides’. There remains Ernout's objection that the suppression of the final s of lapis is unlikely. One can only say that no one would have ventured to introduce by conjecture pendentibu' structas or manantibu' stillent, but both are found in Lucretius' text
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
E. J. Kenney (1977). The Loeb Lucretius Lucretius, De Rerum Natura. With an English Translation by W.H.D. Rouse. Revised with New Text, Introduction, Notes, and Index by Martin Ferguson Smith. (Loeb Classical Library). Pp. Lxii + 602. London: Heinemann, 1975. Cloth, £3·40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (02):180-182.
Monte Ransome Johnson & Catherine Wilson (2007). Lucretius and the History of Science. In Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press.
W. R. Inge (1940). Two Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 54 (04):188-.
R. J. Shackle (1921). Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 35 (7-8):156-.
Wendell Clausen (1991). Three Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 41 (02):544-.
Martin F. Smith (1993). Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 43 (01):336-.
David A. West (1964). Two Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 14 (01):94-.
Martin F. Smith (1966). Three Textual Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 16 (03):264-266.
M. L. Clarke (1971). Lucretius' Imagery David West: The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius. Pp. Viii+142. Edinburgh: University Press, 1969. Cloth, £1·75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (01):41-43.
Ralph Keen (1979). Notes on Epicurean Terminology and Lucretius. Apeiron 13 (2):63 - 69.
S. M. M. Furness (1923). Notes on Some Passages of Lucretius, Book V. The Classical Review 37 (1-2):20-21.
E. L. B. Meurig Davies (1950). Notes on Euripides, Lucretius, and Claudian. The Classical Review 64 (3-4):94-95.
Alison Brown (2010). The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Harvard University Press.
Margaret Graver (1990). The Eye of the Beholder: Perceptual Relativity in Lucretius. Apeiron 23 (4):91 - 116.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads1 ( #506,151 of 1,679,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?