David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 41 (01):257- (1991)
This comes near to satisfying; but even with ipsa the change of subject from tecta to plaustra is awkward, and exsultant is inappropriate to a lumbering plaustrum . I suggest reading cisia instead of ipsa. The cisium was a fast light two-wheeled vehicle which might well jump up on a rough road; and the first three letters cis could have become the -es of the MS exsultantes. Two further points: lapis uiai is not ‘a stone on the road’ , but rather the stone of the road, i.e. the paving; and utrimque is not ‘on one side or the other’ but ‘on both sides’. There remains Ernout's objection that the suppression of the final s of lapis is unlikely. One can only say that no one would have ventured to introduce by conjecture pendentibu' structas or manantibu' stillent, but both are found in Lucretius' text
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Monte Ransome Johnson & Catherine Wilson (2007). Lucretius and the History of Science. In Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press
W. R. Inge (1940). Two Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 54 (04):188-.
R. J. Shackle (1921). Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 35 (7-8):156-.
Wendell Clausen (1991). Three Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 41 (02):544-.
Martin F. Smith (1993). Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 43 (01):336-.
David A. West (1964). Two Notes on Lucretius. Classical Quarterly 14 (01):94-.
Martin F. Smith (1966). Three Textual Notes on Lucretius. The Classical Review 16 (03):264-266.
M. L. Clarke (1971). Lucretius' Imagery David West: The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius. Pp. Viii+142. Edinburgh: University Press, 1969. Cloth, £1·75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (01):41-43.
Ralph Keen (1979). Notes on Epicurean Terminology and Lucretius. Apeiron 13 (2):63 - 69.
S. M. M. Furness (1923). Notes on Some Passages of Lucretius, Book V. The Classical Review 37 (1-2):20-21.
E. L. B. Meurig Davies (1950). Notes on Euripides, Lucretius, and Claudian. The Classical Review 64 (3-4):94-95.
Alison Brown (2010). The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Harvard University Press.
Margaret Graver (1990). The Eye of the Beholder: Perceptual Relativity in Lucretius. Apeiron 23 (4):91-116.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads1 ( #831,150 of 2,072,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?