Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):477-95 (1996)
|Abstract||The goal of this paper is to challenge the rather insouciant attitude that many investigators seem to adopt when they go about describing the items and events in their "visual fields". There are at least three distinct categories of interpretation of what these reports might mean, and only under one of those categories do those reports have anything resembling an observational character. The others demand substantive revisions in one's beliefs about what one sees. The ur-concept of a "visual field" is that of the "sum of things seen", but one can interpret the latter in very different ways. The first is the "field of view", or the sum of physical things seen. The second is an array of visual impressions, whose spatial relations are distinct from those of physical phenomena in front of the eyes. The third is an intentional object: the world as it is represented visually. These three categories are described, and various locutions of vision science--such as "optic array", "retinocentric space", "visual geometry", "virtual object" and others--are analyzed and variously located within them. Finally, a recent argument purporting to necessitate the existence of a version two visual field is examined and shown wanting|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
L. M. Vaina (1990). What and Where in the Human Visual System: Two Hierarchies of Visual Modules. Synthese 83 (1):49-91.
Tony Ro & Robert Rafal (2006). Visual Restoration in Cortical Blindness: Insights From Natural and TMS-Induced Blindsight. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 16 (4):377-396.
Farid Masrour (forthcoming). The Geometry of Visual Space and the Nature of Visual Experience. Philosophical Studies.
Jennifer D. Ryan & Neal J. Cohen (2001). The Existence of Internal Visual Memory Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1002-1003.
David W. Hamlyn (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107:107-124.
Rainer Goebel, Lars Muckli, Friedhelm E. Zanella, Wolf Singer & Petra Stoerig (2001). Sustained Extrastriate Cortical Activation Without Visual Awareness Revealed by fMRI Studies in Hemianopic Patients. Vision Research 41 (10):1459-1474.
Louise Richardson (2010). Seeing Empty Space. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):227-243.
John Dilworth (2002). Varieties of Visual Representation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206.
A. C. Lloyd (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 125:125-144.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #28,106 of 722,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,384 of 722,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?