David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 47 (3):467-481 (2013)
It is often alleged that, unlike typical axioms of mathematics, the Continuum Hypothesis (CH) is indeterminate. This position is normally defended on the ground that the CH is undecidable in a way that typical axioms are not. Call this kind of undecidability “absolute undecidability”. In this paper, I seek to understand what absolute undecidability could be such that one might hope to establish that (a) CH is absolutely undecidable, (b) typical axioms are not absolutely undecidable, and (c) if a mathematical hypothesis is absolutely undecidable, then it is indeterminate. I shall argue that on no understanding of absolute undecidability could one hope to establish all of (a)–(c). However, I will identify one understanding of absolute undecidability on which one might hope to establish both (a) and (c) to the exclusion of (b). This suggests that a new style of mathematical antirealism deserves attention—one that does not depend on familiar epistemological or ontological concerns. The key idea behind this view is that typical mathematical hypotheses are indeterminate because they are relevantly similar to CH
|Keywords||Continuum Hypothesis Undecidability indeterminacy Disagreement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
George Boolos (1998). Must We Believe in Set Theory? In Richard Jeffrey (ed.), Logic, Logic, and Logic. Harvard University Press. 120-132.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
Solomon Feferman, Harvey M. Friedman, Penelope Maddy & John R. Steel (2000). Does Mathematics Need New Axioms? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):401-446.
Hartry Field (1989). Realism, Mathematics & Modality. Basil Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
Justin Clarke-Doane (2014). Moral Epistemology: The Mathematics Analogy. Noûs 48 (2):238-255.
Similar books and articles
Raymond M. Smullyan (1992). Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. Oxford University Press.
Karen Crawley, Limited Ink : Interpreting and Misinterpreting GÜdel's Incompleteness Theorem in Legal Theory.
Peter Koellner (2010). On the Question of Absolute Undecidability. In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Philosophia Mathematica. Association for Symbolic Logic. 153-188.
Patrick Grim (1997). The Undecidability of the Spatialized Prisoner's Dilemma. Theory and Decision 42 (1):53-80.
Noah Horwitz (2002). Derrida and the Aporia of the Political, or the Theologico-Political Dimension of Deconstruction. Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):156-176.
Miklós Erdélyi-Szabó (2000). Undecidability of the Real-Algebraic Structure of Models of Intuitionistic Elementary Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1014-1030.
J. Siekmann & P. Szabó (1989). The Undecidability of the DA-Unification Problem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):402 - 414.
A. Calcagno (2004). Jacques Derrida and Alain Badiou: Is There a Relation Between Politics and Time? Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (7):799-815.
Alfred Tarski (1968/2010). Undecidable Theories. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..
Added to index2010-03-03
Total downloads255 ( #2,403 of 1,692,213 )
Recent downloads (6 months)97 ( #589 of 1,692,213 )
How can I increase my downloads?