Endogenous versus exogenous change: Change detection, self and agency
Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):198-214 (2010)
| Abstract | The goal of this study is to characterize observers’ abilities to discriminate between endogenous (i.e., self-produced) and exogenous changes. To do so, we developed a new experimental paradigm. On each trial, participants were shown a dot pattern on the screen. Next, the pattern disappeared and participants were to reproduce it. Changes were surreptuously introduced in the stimulus, either by presenting participants anew with the dot pattern they had themselves produced on the previous trial (endogenous change) or by presenting participants with a slightly different dot pattern (exogenous changes). We analyzed awareness of the changes and behavioral adaptation to them in a dynamical manner. We observe (1) signal attenuation in the presence of endogenous change, (2) dissociation between self-attribution reports and behavioral effect of agency. We discuss the source of this sensitive attenuation as well as the relation between a minimal or core self and an extended, narrative or autobiographical self. Crown Copyright Ó 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAxel Cleeremans (2010). Action Blindness in Response to Gradual Changes. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):152-171.
Bruno Berberian & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Endogenous Versus Exogenous Change: Change Detection, Self and Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):198-214.
James Edward Swain, Linda C. Mayes & James F. Leckman (2005). Endogenous and Exogenous Opiates Modulate the Development of Parent–Infant Attachment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):364-365.
Ronald A. Rensink (2002). Change Detection. 53:245-277.
Diego Fernandez-Duque & Ian Thornton (2000). Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? Visual Cognition 7 (1):323-344.
Paolo Bartolomeo & Sylvie Chokron (2001). Visual Awareness Relies on Exogenous Orienting of Attention: Evidence From Unilateral Neglect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):975-976.
Martino Rizzotti (1995). Cilium: Origin and 9-Fold Symmetry. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (3).
Carmen Stoian & Rodica Milena Zaharia (2012). CSR Development in Post-Communist Economies: Employees' Expectations Regarding Corporate Socially Responsible Behaviour – the Case of Romania. Business Ethics 21 (4):380-401.
Mika Koivisto & Antti Revonsuo (2003). An ERP Study of Change Detection, Change Blindness, and Visual Awareness. Psychophysiology 40 (3):423-429.
Ton van Helvoort (1994). The Construction of Bacteriophage as Bacterial Virus: Linking Endogenous and Exogenous Thought Styles. Journal of the History of Biology 27 (1):91 - 139.
G. Chastain & M. Cheal (1999). Attention Effects of Abrupt-Onset Precues with Central, Single-Element, and Multiple-Element Precues. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):510-528.
Ian Thornton & Diego Fernandez-Duque (2000). An Implicit Measure of Undetected Change. Spatial Vision 14 (1):21-44.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads1 ( #274,507 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
