Inference, practice and theory

Synthese 34 (1):89 - 132 (1977)
Reichenbach held that all scientific inference reduces, via probability calculus, to induction, and he held that induction can be justified. He sees scientific knowledge in a practical context and insists that any rational assessment of actions requires a justification of induction. Gaps remain in his justifying argument; for we can not hope to prove that induction will succeed if success is possible. However, there are good prospects for completing a justification of essentially the kind he sought by showing that while induction may succeed, no alternative is a rational way of trying.Reichenbach's claim that probability calculus, especially via Bayes' Theorem, can help to exhibit the structure of inference to theories is a valuable insight. However, his thesis that the weighting of all hypotheses rests only on frequency data is too restrictive, especially given his scientific realism. Other empirical factors are relevant. Any satisfactory account of scientific inference must be deeply indebted to Reichenbach's foundation work.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00485637
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Max Black (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Wesley C. Salmon (1967). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. [Pittsburgh]University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hans Reichenbach (1949). The Theory of Probability. Berkeley, University of California Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
F. John Clendinnen (1983). The Rationality of Method Verssus Historical Relativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (1):23-38.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

29 ( #106,672 of 1,725,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,647 of 1,725,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.