David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):443-460 (2006)
Can it be consistent to be interested, for moral reasons, in the fact that uninvolved spectators of a regime change are enthusiastic about that change, when the latter is carried out according to means considered immoral or unjust? Yes. In An Old Question Raised Again ( The Conflict of the Faculties , 1798), Kant demonstrates a morally based interest in disinterested spectators expressions (aesthetic judgments) of enthusiasm for the idea of a republican form of government. This interest is puzzling. Kant's universalizability test supposedly forbids the violent revolutionary means taken to establish the republican constitution. How can the Kantian, if consistent, take an interest in expressions of enthusiasm elicited by these immoral events? In addition to endorsing the familiar means/ends distinction, this article provides a new answer to this question by examining the enthusiasm in which Kant takes an interest: it is a pure aesthetic judgment of enthusiasm, made by a disinterested, impartial spectator. Key Words: aesthetic judgment enthusiasm idea interest Immanuel Kant republic spectator.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Phillips (2011). Placing Ugliness in Kant's Third Critique : A Reply to Paul Guyer. Kant-Studien 102 (3):385-395.
Pauline Kleingeld (1999). Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development. History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Robert Hopkins (2001). Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement. European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):166–189.
A. Degryse (2011). Sensus Communis as a Foundation for Men as Political Beings: Arendt's Reading of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
Christian Helmut Wenzel (2009). Kant's Aesthetics: Overview and Recent Literature. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):380-406.
Gail Linsenbard (2007). Sartre's Criticisms of Kant's Moral Philosophy. Sartre Studies International 13 (2):65-85.
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
Ralf M. Bader (forthcoming). Self-Knowledge in §7 of the Transcendental Aesthetic. In Stefano Bacin (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Kongress. de Gruyter.
Robert R. Clewis (2009). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Aaron Bunch (2010). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):532-533.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #188,497 of 1,102,967 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,967 )
How can I increase my downloads?