Why a Set Contains its Members Essentially
Noûs 19 (4):585 - 602 (1985)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Van Cleve (1985). Why a Set Contains its Members Essentially. Noûs 19 (4):585-602.
Alvin Plantinga & Patrick Grim (1993). Truth, Omniscience, and Cantorian Arguments: An Exchange. Philosophical Studies 71 (3):267 - 306.
Hartley Slater (2003). Aggregate Theory Versus Set Theory. Erkenntnis 59 (2):189 - 202.
Øystein Linnebo (2010). Pluralities and Sets. Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):144-164.
Andreas Weiermann (1993). Bounds for the Closure Ordinals of Essentially Monotonic Increasing Functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):664-671.
S. Matthew Liao (2009). Is There a Duty to Share Genetic Information? Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):306-309.
Stephen Pollard (1996). Sets, Wholes, and Limited Pluralitiest. Philosophia Mathematica 4 (1):42-58.
Morten Huse, Sabina Tacheva Nielsen & Inger Marie Hagen (2009). Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):581 - 597.
Y. Ilker Topcu (2010). Have Ethical Perceptions Changed? A Comparative Study on the Ethical Perceptions of Turkish Faculty Members. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):137-151.
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2006). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads1 ( #274,602 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
