David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):15-31 (2007)
In this essay on epistemological development in college students, I argue that “subjectivism” (a.k.a. “multiplism;” often identified in female undergraduates) should be understood and treated not as amanifestation of a primitive, irrational notion of knowing that must be exterminated and replaced by the more impersonal, detached, objective procedures embodied in scientific method and critical thinking. Rather, it should be regarded as a point of departure for moving into more reflective modes of thought when approached via, and encouraged into, the more personal, empathic procedure made known in Women’s Ways of Knowing as “connected knowing.” Along the way, I develop further the difference between “connected knowing” and “separate knowing” (the latter being the dominant academic paradigm of knowing), bringing out how connected knowing is an important and at times indispensable complement to separate knowing in achieving an objectivity integrated with subjectivity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Esther L. Meek (2007). Cultivating Connected Knowing in the Classroom. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):40-48.
Dale Cannon (2007). How Clinchy's Two Minds Might Become One Flesh. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):32-39.
Blythe McVicker Clinchy (2007). Pursued by Polanyi. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):54-67.
Blythe McVicker Clinchy (2007). A Response to the Responses. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):68-71.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
Stephen Hetherington (2008). Knowing-That, Knowing-How, and Knowing Philosophically. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):307-324.
Joseph Shieber (2003). What Our Rylean Ancestors Knew: More on Knowing How and Knowing That. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:328-330.
Jeremy Fantl (2008). Knowing-How and Knowing-That. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):451–470.
Kyle Takaki (2009). Embodied Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):26-39.
Refeng Tang (2011). Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Elizabeth Newman (1993). An Alternative Form of Theological Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 20 (1):13-26.
Zhenhua Yu (2007). Feminist Epistemology in a Polanyian Perspective. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):49-53.
Dale Cannon (2007). A Serendipitous Convergence. Tradition and Discovery 34 (1):9-14.
Brain T. Trainor (2010). The Divine Undergirding Of Human Knowing. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):205-234.
Karyn L. Lai (2012). Knowing to Act in the Moment: Examples From Confucius'Analects. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):347-364.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads30 ( #69,457 of 1,692,428 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #6,704 of 1,692,428 )
How can I increase my downloads?