Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics involves two assumptions: one about locality and the other about when it is legitimate to infer the existence of an element-of-reality. Using one simple thought experiment, we argue that quantum predictions and the relativity of simultaneity require that both these assumptions fail, whether or not quantum mechanics is complete.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/192748
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Yemima Ben-Menahem (1997). Dummett Vs Bell on Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):277-290.
Michael Dickson (1993). Stapp's Theorem Without Counterfactual Commitments: Why It Fails Nonetheless. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (5):791-814.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Peter Kosso (2000). Quantum Mechanics and Realism. Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

18 ( #150,849 of 1,725,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.