David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (1):107-129 (2009)
This article argues that Kongzi's religious ethics suggests an alternative way of understanding the relationship between the right and the good, in which neither takes clear precedence in terms of being more foundational for ethics. The religious underpinnings of Kongzi's understanding of the Way are examined, including the close relationship between tian ("Heaven") and the Way. It is shown that following the Way is defined primarily by the extent to which one's actions express certain virtues, and not whether one's actions are conducive to the best overall outcome or whether they are inherently right irrespective of consequences. It is then argued that the Way is seen as constitutive of both the right and the good, and that this understanding of the right and the good has important implications for contemporary virtue ethics, religious ethics, and political philosophy
|Keywords||tian good dao Kongzi Confucianism right Analects|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ewing Y. Chinn (2008). The Good is Prior to the Right: Rosemont on Human Rights. In Marthe Chandler Ronnie Littlejohn (ed.), Polishing the Chinese Mirror: Essays in Honor of Henry Rosemont, Jr. 67.
Erin M. Cline (2008). Rawls, Rosemont, and the Debate Over Rights and Roles.”. In Marthe Chandler Ronnie Littlejohn (ed.), Polishing the Chinese Mirror: Essays in Honor of Henry Rosemont, Jr. 76.
Erin M. Cline (2007). Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):361-381.
C. Stephen Evans (2004). Kierkegaard's Ethic of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations. Oxford University Press.
Samuel Freeman (1994). Utilitarianism, Deontology, and the Priority of Right. Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (4):313–349.
Citations of this work BETA
Jesse Couenhoven (2010). Against Metaethical Imperialism: Several Arguments for Equal Partnerships Between the Deontic and Aretaic. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):521-544.
Pak-Hang Wong (2012). Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):67-86.
Similar books and articles
Heather Battaly (2010). Introduction: Virtue and Vice. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):1-21.
Philip J. Ivanhoe (1991). Character Consequentialism: An Early Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Theory. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):55 - 70.
C. Behan McCullagh (2007). Can Religious Beliefs Be Justified Pragmatically? Sophia 46 (1):21-34.
Eugene Garver (2006). Confronting Aristotle's Ethics: Ancient and Modern Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Edwin M. Hartman (2008). Reconciliation in Business Ethics: Some Advice From Aristotle. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):253-265.
Rosalind Mcdougall (2013). Understanding Doctors' Ethical Challenges as Role Virtue Conflicts. Bioethics 27 (1):20-27.
David Hollenbach (2002). The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Erin M. Cline (2009). Nameless Virtues and Restrained Speech in the Analects. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1):53-69.
Delio (2009). Is Creation Really Good? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1):3 - 22.
Edwin M. Hartman (1998). The Role of Character in Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):547-559.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #139,143 of 1,696,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?