David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 265-279 (2008)
In assessing the appropriateness of a scientific community's research effort, Solomon considers a number of "decision vectors," divided into the empirical and non-empirical. Value judgments get sorted as non-empirical vectors. By way of contrast, I introduce Anderson's discussion of the evidential role of value judgments. Like Anderson, I argue that value judgments are empirical in the relevant sense. I argue further that Solomon's decision matrix needs to be reconceptualized: the distinction should not be between the empirical vs. non-empirical, but between the relevant vs. irrelevant. Whether particular value judgments are relevant or not is an empirical question, to be decided on a case-by-case basis.
|Keywords||Values Feminism Empiricism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elizabeth Anderson (2004). Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons From a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia 19 (1):1-24.
Richmond Campbell (1994). The Virtues of Feminist Empiricism. Hypatia 9 (1):90 - 115.
Sharyn Clough & William E. Loges (2008). Racist Value Judgments as Objectively False Beliefs: A Philosophical and Social-Psychological Analysis. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (1):77–95.
Michael Hymers (2003). The Dignity of a Rule: Wittgenstein, Mathematical Norms, and Truth. Dialogue 42 (03):419-446.
Lynn Hankinson Nelson (1993). A Question of Evidence. Hypatia 8 (2):172 - 189.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Erik Weber (1999). Rationality in the Discovery of Empirical Laws. Foundations of Science 4 (3):357-370.
Daniel Gilman (1992). What's a Theory to Do... With Seeing? Or Some Empirical Considerations for Observation and Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):287-309.
Bert Gordijn Rob de Vries (2009). Empirical Ethics and its Alleged Meta-Ethical Fallacies. Bioethics 23 (4):193-201.
Vassilios P. Filios (1986). Review and Analysis of the Empirical Research in Corporate Social Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):291 - 306.
Janice A. Singer & Norman G. Vinson (forthcoming). Ethical Issues in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering. Philosophical Explorations.
Nick Zangwill (2010). Science and Ethics: Demarcation, Holism and Logical Consequences. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):126-138.
Alison Wylie (2008). A More Social Epistemology: Decision Vectors, Epistemic Fairness, and Consensus in Solomon's Social Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 237-240.
Miriam Solomon (2008). Responses to Critics. Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 280-284.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads94 ( #12,529 of 1,101,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #28,199 of 1,101,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?