Faith and Philosophy 16 (4):523-543 (1999)
|Abstract||This essay introduces central features of classical Hindu reflection on the existence and nature of God by examining arguments presented in the Nyāyamañjarī of Jayanta Bhatta (9th century CE), and the Nyāyasiddhāñjana of Vedānta Deśika (14th century CE). Jayanta represents the Nyāya school of Hindu logic and philosophical theology, which argued that God’s existence could be known by a form of the cosmological argument. Vedānta Deśika represents the Vedånta theological tradition, which denied that God’s existencecould be known by reason, gave primacy to the revelatory texts known as the Upanisads, and firmly subordinated theological reasoning to the acceptance of revelation. Jayanta and Deśika are respected representatives of their traditions whose clear, systematic positions illumine traditional Hindu understandings of “God” and the traditional Hindu debates about God’s existence and nature. Attention to their positions highlights striking common features shared by Hindu and Christian theologies, and offers a substantial basis for comparative reflection on the Christian understanding of God’s existence and nature, and the roles of reason and revelation in knowledge of God|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bruce Milem (2007). Turner on Reason and Proving God's Existence. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):79-94.
Keith E. Yandell (1999). God, Freedom, and Creation in Cross-Cultural Perspective. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:147-168.
T. J. Mawson (2003). How a Single Personal Revelation Might Not Be a Source of Knowledge. Religious Studies 39 (3):347-357.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2006). Arguments for the Existence of God: The Continental European Debate. In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, Volume 2. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Nikolai Biryukov (2008). The Dialectic of Theological Reason Reversing the Ontological, Cosmological and Teleological Arguments. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:65-68.
Balazs Mezei (2009). Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99 - 120.
Thomas C. Oden (1984/1992). The Living God. Harpersanfrancisco.
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Parimal G. Patil (2009). Against a Hindu God: Buddhist Philosophy of Religion in India. Columbia University Press.
Balázs M. Mezei (2006). Divine Revelation and Human Person. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
A. J. Nicholson (2003). Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries Between Religions (Review). Philosophy East and West 53 (4):599-601.
Lydia Schumacher (2011). The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God. Modern Theology 27 (1):87 - 101.
Patrick Frierson (2011). Rational Faith: God, Immortality, Grace. In Immanuel Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing Limited.
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2009). Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3).
Samuel Clarke (1998). A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #188,971 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?