Olympism, The Values Of Sport, and the will to Power: De Coubertin And Nietzsche Meet Eugenio Monti
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (2):183-194 (2012)
| Abstract | The ?values of sport? is a concept that is often used to justify actions and policies by a range of agents and agencies from coaches and teachers to governing bodies and educational institutions. From a philosophical point of view, these values deserve to be analysed with great care to make sure we understand their nature and reach. The aim of this paper is to critically examine the values carried by the educational conception of sport that Pierre de Coubertin developed and to see how they relate to certain values in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. To be able to understand in depth the moral construct of de Coubertin's system, it is essential to delve into the entire system he builds in order to develop athletic participants closer to his ideal of what a human should be. This in turn rests on his conception of Man, which is comprised of body, spirit and character. An understanding of his structure opens the way to a broader awareness of de Coubertin's educational system, of which sport was only part. We will then see that the values are a consequence of this pedagogical search for the ideal human. It is argued that this ideal of a human is similar to the one described by Nietzsche as the Übermensch . A philosophical case study is conducted, taking as its object the story of the first recipient of the Pierre de Coubertin medal, which rewards fair play among Olympic competitors. Judging the story through Nietzschean eyes allows for his thoughts to be put into practice. His lesser-known texts such as Homer and Competition on the emulation of creative powers shed light on today's sports. Concepts such as guilt, excellence, will to power and effectiveness help us compare these two authors and understand that competition is not necessarily about dominating others, but more about generating human excellence | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIrena Martínková (2012). Fair or Temple: Two Possibilities for Olympic Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (2):166-182.
Graham McFee (2012). Olympism and Sport's Intrinsic Value. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (2):211-231.
Teresa Lacerda (2011). From Ode to Sport To Contemporary Aesthetic Categories of Sport: Strength Considered as an Aesthetic Category. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (4):447 - 456.
Stefano Scarpa & Attilio Nicola Carraro (2011). Does Christianity Demean the Body and Deny the Value of Sport? – A Provocative Thesis. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (2):110 - 123.
Melinda Rosenberg (2008). Nietzsche, Competition and Athletic Ability. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (3):274 – 284.
M. Andrew Holowchak (2001). Excellence as Athletic Ideal. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):153-164.
J. S. Russell (2012). The Ideal Fan or Good Fans? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):16-30.
Nadeem J. Z. Hussain (2007). Honest Illusion: Valuing for Nietzsche's Free Spirits. In Brian Leiter & Neil Sinhababu (eds.), Nietzsche and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Graham McFee (2009). The Intrinsic Value of Sport: A Reply to Culbertson. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 3 (1):19-29.
Aaron Ridley (2005). Vi *-Nietzsche and the Re-Evaluation of Values. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):155-175.
Hywel Iorwerth, Carwyn Jones & Alun Hardman (2012). The Moral Pathologies of National Sporting Representation at the Olympics. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (2):267-288.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-05-11Total downloads4 ( #178,800 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
