Deeper problems for Noonan's probability argument against abortion: On a charitable reading of Noonan's conception criterion of humanity
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 25 (5):280-289 (2011)
In ‘An Almost Absolute Value in History’ John T. Noonan criticizes several attempts to provide a criterion for when an entity deserves rights. These criteria, he argues are either arbitrary or lead to absurd consequence. Noonan proposes human conception as the criterion of rights, and justifies it by appeal to the sharp shift in probability, at conception, of becoming a being possessed of human reason. Conception, then, is when abortion becomes immoral.The article has an historical and a philosophical goal. The historical goal is to carefully present the probability argument in a charitable manner. The philosophical goal is to offer a unique criticism of Noonan's probability argument against abortion. I argue that, even on a very charitable reading of Noonan's argument for the conception criterion, this criterion is also susceptible to charges of arbitrariness and absurdity. Noonan's claim that probability shifts have anything to do with the moral rights of fetuses cannot be made coherent. I also show that there are problems with Noonan's assumptions about moral rights and the potential to become a being possessed of human reason
|Keywords||rights abortion human potential probability Noonan conception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harold W. Noonan (1989). Personal Identity. Routledge.
Richard Otte (1987). A Theistic Conception of Probability. Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):427-447.
Harold W. Noonan (2009). What is a One-Level Criterion of Identity? Analysis 69 (2):274-277.
Mark Strasser (1987). Noonan on Contraception and Abortion. Bioethics 1 (2):199–205.
Patrick J. Coffey (1988). Humanae Vitae and Licit Contraception? Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):172-182.
H. W. Noonan (1977). An Argument of Aristotle on Non-Contradiction. Analysis 37 (4):163 - 169.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Harold W. Noonan (2003). A Flawed Argument for Perdurance. Analysis 63 (279):213–215.
Elisa Paganini (2011). Vague Objects Without Ontically Indeterminate Identity. Erkenntnis 74 (3):351-362.
Richard Francis Galvin (1988). Noonan's Argument Against Abortion: Probability, Possibility and Potentiality. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (2):80-89.
Added to index2009-10-27
Total downloads84 ( #49,450 of 1,796,173 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #284,809 of 1,796,173 )
How can I increase my downloads?