A Sceptical Examination of Contemporary British Philosophy
London, New York [Etc.]Brentano's Ltd. (1929)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Philosophy, English | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Call number | B1615.C63 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Hetherington (2009). Sceptical Possibilities? No Worries. Synthese 168 (1):97 - 118.
Robert Brown (1970). Between Hume and Mill: An Anthology of British Philosophy, 1749-1843. New York,Modern Library.
Bryan Magee & Anthony Quinton (eds.) (1971/1986). Modern British Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Stephen Buckle (1999). British Sceptical Realism: A Fresh Look at the British Tradition. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):1–29.
John H. Muirhead & Hywel David Lewis (eds.) (1953). Contemporary British Philosophy. New York, Macmillan.
Duncan Pritchard (2005). The Structure of Sceptical Arguments. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):37 - 52.
By Duncan Pritchard (2005). The Structure of Sceptical Arguments. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):37–52.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-05-14Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
