History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93 (2011)
William Whewell raised a series of objections concerning John Stuart Mill’s philosophy of science which suggested that Mill’s views were not properly informed by the history of science or by adequate reflection on scientific practices. The aim of this paper is to revisit and evaluate this incisive Whewellian criticism of Mill’s views by assessing Mill’s account of Michael Faraday’s discovery of electrical induction. The historical evidence demonstrates that Mill’s reconstruction is an inadequate reconstruction of this historical episode and the scientific practices Faraday employed. But a study of Faraday’s research also raises some questions about Whewell’s characterization of this discovery. Thus, this example provides an opportunity to reconsider the debate between Whewell and Mill concerning the role of the sciences in the development of an adequate philosophy of scientific methodology.Keywords: Inductivism; Experiment; Theory; Methodology; Electromagnetism.
|Keywords||J.S. Mill William Whewell History of the Philosophy of Science Michael Faraday|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Friedrich Steinle (1997). Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):74.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):361-376.
Struan Jacobs (1991). John Stuart Mill on Induction and Hypotheses. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.
Laura Snyder (2002). Whewell and the Scientists: Science and Philosophy of Science in 19th Century Britain. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:81-94.
Friedrich Steinle (1994). Experiment, Speculation and Law: Faraday's Analysis of Arago's Wheel. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:293 - 303.
Citations of this work BETA
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2011). Galilean Argumentation and the Inauthenticity of the Cigoli Letter on Painting Vs. Sculpture. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):492-508.
Similar books and articles
John S. Wilkins (2013). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education 22 (2):221-240.
Kent Johnson (2011). Quantitative Realizations of Philosophy of Science: William Whewell and Statistical Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.
John Losee (1983). Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):113-126.
John Wettersten (1994). William Whewell: Problems of Induction Vs. Problems of Rationality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742.
Samuel Hollander (1983). William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the Methodology of Political Economy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):127-168.
Peter Achinstein (1992). Inference to the Best Explanation: Or, Who Won the Mill-Whewell Debate? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):349-364.
Steffen Ducheyne (2010). Whewell's Tidal Researches: Scientific Practice and Philosophical Methodology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
Laura J. Snyder (2006). Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. University of Chicago Press.
Harold T. Walsh (1962). Whewell and Mill on Induction. Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads172 ( #8,834 of 1,725,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #36,451 of 1,725,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?