History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93 (2011)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||J.S. Mill William Whewell History of the Philosophy of Science Michael Faraday|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education.
Kent Johnson (2011). Quantitative Realizations of Philosophy of Science: William Whewell and Statistical Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.
John Losee (1983). Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):113-126.
John Wettersten (1994). William Whewell: Problems of Induction Vs. Problems of Rationality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742.
Samuel Hollander (1983). William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the Methodology of Political Economy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):127-168.
Peter Achinstein (1992). Inference to the Best Explanation: Or, Who Won the Mill-Whewell Debate? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):349-364.
Steffen Ducheyne (2010). Whewell's Tidal Researches: Scientific Practice and Philosophical Methodology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
Laura J. Snyder (2006). Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. University of Chicago Press.
Harold T. Walsh (1962). Whewell and Mill on Induction. Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads47 ( #23,073 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #2,377 of 549,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?