Natural Philosophy and the Use of Causal Terminology: A Puzzle in Reid's Account of Natural Philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):101-114 (2010)
Thomas Reid thinks of natural philosophy as a purely nomothetic enterprise but he maintains that it is proper for natural philosophers to employ causal terminology in formulating their explanatory claims. In this paper, I analyze this puzzle in light of Reid's distinction between efficient and physical causation – a distinction he grounds in his strict understanding of active powers. I consider several possible reasons that Reid may have for maintaining that natural philosophers ought to employ causal terminology and suggest that the underlying rationale for his views is his understanding of the aims of explanation and their connection to the interests of human agents. The ultimate aim of knowing the causes of phenomena is to mollify the natural intellectual curiosity of human inquirers and provide guidance that insures successful action. The discovery of laws governing phenomena fulfills this aim and, as such, it is appropriate for natural philosophers to employ causal terminology
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hagit Benbaji (2003). Reid on Causation and Action. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 1 (1):1-19.
Robert Callergård (2005). Reid and the Newtonian Forces of Attraction. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):139-155.
Robert Callergård (1999). The Hypothesis of Ether and Reid's Interpretation of Newton's First Rule of Philosophizing. Synthese 120 (1):19-26.
Rebecca Copenhaver (2006). Is Thomas Reid a Mysterian? Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):449-466.
Shannon Dea (2005). Thomas Reid's Rigourised Anti-Hypotheticalism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):123-138.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer McKitrick (2002). Reid's Foundation for the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):478-494.
Pablo Razeto-Barry & Ramiro Frick (2011). Probabilistic Causation and the Explanatory Role of Natural Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (3):344-355.
Alexander Broadie (2008). Thomas Reid on Practical Ethics: Lectures and Papers on Natural Religion, Self-Government, Natural Jurisprudence and the Law of Nations. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (2).
Michael Pakaluk (2002). A Defence of Scottish Common Sense. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):564-581.
Amit Hagar (2002). Thomas Reid and Non-Euclidean Geometry. Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
H. L. Dreyfus (2011). Medicine as Combining Natural and Human Science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):335-341.
Philippe Huneman (2012). Natural Selection: A Case for the Counterfactual Approach. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 76 (2):171-194.
Jim Bogen (2005). Regularities and Causality; Generalizations and Causal Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (2):397-420.
Terence Cuneo (2011). A Puzzle Regarding Reid's Theory of Motives. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):963-981.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads77 ( #17,546 of 1,101,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #59,635 of 1,101,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?