What Mill Could (and Should) Have Said about Faraday’s Discovery of Electrical Induction
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesSteven Rappaport (1996). Inference to the Best Explanation: Is It Really Different From Mill's Methods? Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80.
Friedrich Steinle (1994). Experiment, Speculation and Law: Faraday's Analysis of Arago's Wheel. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:293 - 303.
Harold T. Walsh (1962). Whewell and Mill on Induction. Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
John Stuart Mill (1950/2005). Philosophy of Scientific Method. Dover Publications.
Aaron D. Cobb (2009). Michael Faraday's “Historical Sketch of Electro‐Magnetism” and the Theory‐Dependence of Experimentation. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Vladimir Pericliev (1999). The Prospects for Machine Discovery in Linguistics. Foundations of Science 4 (4):463-482.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):361-376.
Aaron D. Cobb (2011). History and Scientific Practice in the Construction of an Adequate Philosophy of Science: Revisiting a Whewell/Mill Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
Ryan D. Tweney (2006). Discovering Discovery: How Faraday Found the First Metallic Colloid. Perspectives on Science 14 (1):97-121.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-05-22Total downloads23 ( #54,691 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,864 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
