Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophy 97 (5):278-296 (2000)
|Abstract||We focus here on some familiar kinds of cases of conflict between friendship and morality, and, on the basis of our account of the nature of friendship, argue for the following two claims: first, that in some cases where we are led morally astray by virtue of a relationship that makes its own demands on us, the relationship in question is properly called a friendship; second, that relationships of this kind are valuable in their own right.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Quill (2009). After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.
William O. Stephens (2011). If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts : A Reply to Andrew Mitchell. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi.
Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett (1998). Friendship and the Self. Ethics 108 (3):502-527.
Bennett W. Helm, Friendship. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wanda Cizewski (1992). Friendship With God? Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.
Joyce L. Jenkins (1999). The Advantages of Civic Friendship. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Barbro Fröding & Martin Peterson (2012). Why Virtual Friendship is No Genuine Friendship. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (3):201-207.
Mary Healy (2011). Should We Take the Friendships of Children Seriously? Journal of Moral Education 40 (4):441-456.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads233 ( #1,180 of 752,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #11,489 of 752,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?