Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):181 - 190 (2010)
|Abstract||Scenarios involving the introduction of artificially intelligent (AI) assistive technologies in health care practices raise several ethical issues. In this paper, I discuss four objections to introducing AI assistive technologies in health care practices as replacements of human care. I analyse them as demands for felt care, good care, private care, and real care. I argue that although these objections cannot stand as good reasons for a general and a priori rejection of AI assistive technologies as such or as replacements of human care, they demand us to clarify what is at stake, to develop more comprehensive criteria for good care, and to rethink existing practices of care. In response to these challenges, I propose a (modified) capabilities approach to care and emphasize the inherent social dimension of care. I also discuss the demand for real care by introducing the ‘Care Experience Machine’ thought experiment. I conclude that if we set the standards of care too high when evaluating the introduction of AI assistive technologies in health care, we have to reject many of our existing, low-tech health care practices.|
|Keywords||Health care Capabilities Good life ethics AI Assistive technology Robots|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dan W. Brock (2001). Children's Rights to Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):163 – 177.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1999). The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift From a Professional to a Market Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):243 – 266.
Daniel Callahan (2001). Health Care for Children: A Community Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):137 – 146.
Andre Vries (1980). Health Care Responsibility. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (1):95-106.
Larry R. Churchill (1999). The United States Health Care System Under Managed Care: How the Commodification of Health Care Distorts Ethics and Threatens Equity. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (4):393-411.
Madison Powers (1997). Managed Care: How Economic Incentive Reforms Went Wrong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
Wm Wildes S. J. Kevin (1999). More Questions Than Answers: The Commodification of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):307 – 311.
Verheijde, Josephus Leonardus, Responsibility and Health Care, Who Cares.... : An Introduction to the Principle of Genuine Responsibility and How This Principle Applies to the Managed Care Model of Health Care Distribution.
Alberto Infante (1995). Setting Priorities in the Spanish Health Care System. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):595-606.
Elin Palm (2013). Who Cares? Moral Obligations in Formal and Informal Care Provision in the Light of ICT-Based Home Care. Health Care Analysis 21 (2):171-188.
Added to index2009-07-25
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?