Moral Responsibility, Technology, and Experiences of the Tragic: From Kierkegaard to Offshore Engineering
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):35-48 (2012)
The standard response to engineering disasters like the Deepwater Horizon case is to ascribe full moral responsibility to individuals and to collectives treated as individuals. However, this approach is inappropriate since concrete action and experience in engineering contexts seldom meets the criteria of our traditional moral theories. Technological action is often distributed rather than individual or collective, we lack full control of the technology and its consequences, and we lack knowledge and are uncertain about these consequences. In this paper, I analyse these problems by employing Kierkegaardian notions of tragedy and moral responsibility in order to account for experiences of the tragic in technological action. I argue that ascription of responsibility in engineering contexts should be sensitive to personal experiences of lack of control, uncertainty, role conflicts, social dependence, and tragic choice. I conclude that this does not justify evading individual and corporate responsibility, but inspires practices of responsibility ascription that are less ‘harsh’ on those directly involved in technological action, that listen to their personal experiences, and that encourage them to gain more knowledge about what they are doing
|Keywords||info:mesh/Disasters info:mesh/Choice Behavior info:mesh/Social Behavior info:mesh/Engineering info:mesh/Uncertainty info:mesh/Humans Humans Uncertainty Social Behavior Professional Role Choice Behavior Disasters Engineering Technology Ethics, Business Moral Obligations Petroleum Pollution info:mesh/Professional Role info:mesh/Moral Obligations info:mesh/Petroleum Pollution info:mesh/Ethics, Business info:mesh/Technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
Martha Craven Nussbaum (2001). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle (2006). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Charles E. Harris (2008). The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):153-164.
Antony Duff (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Pub..
Citations of this work BETA
Merel Noorman (2014). Responsibility Practices and Unmanned Military Technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):809-826.
Neelke Doorn & Ibo van de Poel (2012). Editors' Overview: Moral Responsibility in Technology and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):1-11.
Similar books and articles
Mark Coeckelbergh (2010). Criminals or Patients? Towards a Tragic Conception of Moral and Legal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):233-244.
Neelke Doorn (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
Deborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):99-107.
Mark Coeckelbergh & Ger Wackers (2007). Imagination, Distributed Responsibility and Vulnerable Technological Systems: The Case of Snorre A. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):235-248.
Katinka Waelbers (2009). Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
Tracy Isaacs (2011). Moral Responsibility in Collective Contexts. Oxford University Press.
Golnaz Hashemian & Michael C. Loui (2010). Can Instruction in Engineering Ethics Change Students' Feelings About Professional Responsibility? Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):201-215.
M. Braham & M. van Hees (2012). An Anatomy of Moral Responsibility. Mind 121 (483):601-634.
I. van de Poel (2012). Technology and Parental Responsibility: The Case of the V-Chip. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):285-300.
J. Fahlquist & I. van de Poel (2012). Technology and Parental Responsibility: The Case of the V-Chip. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):285-300.
Armin Grunwald (2001). The Application of Ethics to Engineering and the Engineer's Moral Responsibility: Perspectives for a Research Agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):415-428.
John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Alznauer (2008). Hegel on Legal and Moral Responsibility. Inquiry 51 (4):365 – 389.
Michael Davis (2012). “Ain't No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):13-34.
Kenton Machina (2007). Moral Responsibility—What is All the Fuss About? Acta Analytica 22 (1):29-47.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads26 ( #149,696 of 1,906,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,308 of 1,906,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?