AI and Society 28 (1):55-63 (2013)
|Abstract||Are the robots coming? Is the singularity near? Will we be dominated by technology? The usual response to ethical issues raised by pervasive and ubiquitous technologies assumes a philosophical anthropology centered on existential autonomy and agency, a dualistic ontology separating humans from technology and the natural from the artificial, and a post-monotheistic dualist and creational spirituality. This paper explores an alternative, less modern vision of the “technological” future based on different assumptions: a “deep relational” view of human being and self, an ecological view of human–technology relations, and “ubiquitous” spirituality. Moving beyond an ethics of fear and control, it is argued that technology is part of a lived and active whole that is at the same time human, technological, social, and spiritual. Influenced by ecological and Eastern thinking, it is concluded that an ethics of technology understood as a relational ethics of life asks us to adapt and grow within this multi-faced ecology, which is currently—but not necessarily—pervaded by hyper-individualist modernity and its ego-boosting technologies of the self. This growth is only possible by relating to, and learning from, other cultures and from their specific way of pervading and being pervaded|
|Keywords||Pervasive technology Ubiquitous technology Artificial intelligence Ethics Autonomy Self Ecology Phenomenology Spirituality Buddhism Taoism Confucianism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Abbott (2005). Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions. Sociological Theory 23 (3):245-274.
Greta Gaard (2011). Green, Pink, and Lavender: Banishing Ecophobia Through Queer Ecologies, Review ofQueer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire, Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands and Bruce Erickson, Eds. Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):115-126.
Kiyokuni Shiga (2011). Remarks on the Origin of All-Inclusive Pervasion. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):521-534.
Nadeem J. Z. Hussain (2007). Honest Illusion: Valuing for Nietzsche's Free Spirits. In Brian Leiter & Neil Sinhababu (eds.), Nietzsche and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Cohen (2010). Science, Culture, and Free Spirits: A Study of Nietzsche's Human, All-Too-Human. Humanity Books.
Donald K. Swearer & Susan Lloyd McGarry (eds.) (2011). Ecologies of Human Flourishing. Distributed by Harvard University Press.
Willem B. Drees (2013). Techno‐Secularity and Techno‐Sapiens: Editorial for Zygon's First Real Virtual Issue. Zygon 48 (1):5-8.
Malcolm Bull (2009). Nietzsche's Negative Ecologies. Townsend Center for the Humanities, University of California Press.
Zeljko Jokic (2008). Yanomami Shamanic Initiation: The Meaning of Death and Postmortem Consciousness in Transformation. Anthropology of Consciousness 19 (1):33-59.
M. Andrew Holowchak (2010). Technology and Freudian Discontent: Freud's'muffled' Meliorism and the Problem of Human Annihilation. Sophia 49 (1):95-111.
ron Kaldis (2008). Techno-Science and Religious Sin: Orthodox Theology and Heidegger. Sophia 47 (2).
Kisor Kumar Chakrabarti (2010). Classical Indian Philosophy of Induction: The Nyaya Viewpoint. Lexington Books.
Maoze Zhang (2011). Confucius' Transformation of Traditional Religious Ideas. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):20-40.
Added to index2012-04-20
Total downloads7 ( #142,281 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?