With hope and imagination: Imaginative moral decision-making in neonatal intensive care units [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (1):3 - 21 (2007)
Although the role of imagination in moral reasoning is often neglected, recent literature, mostly of pragmatist signature, points to imagination as one of its central elements. In this article we develop some of their arguments by looking at the moral role of imagination in practice, in particular the practice of neonatal intensive care. Drawing on empirical research, we analyze a decision-making process in various stages: delivery, staff meeting, and reflection afterwards. We show how imagination aids medical practitioners demarcating moral categories, tuning their actions, and exploring long-range consequences of decisions. We argue that imagination helps to bring about at least four kinds of integration in the moral decision-making process: personal integration by creating a moral self-image in moments of reflection; social integration by aiding the conciliation of the diverging perspectives of the people involved; temporal integration by facilitating the parties to transcend the present moment and connect past, present, and future; and epistemological integration by helping to combine the various forms of knowledge and experience needed to make moral decisions. Furthermore, we argue that the role of imagination in these moral decision-processes is limited in several significant ways. Rather than being a solution itself, it is merely an aid and cannot replace the decision itself. Finally, there are also limits to the practical relevance of this theoretical reflection. In the end, it is up to care professionals as reflective practitioners to re-imagine the practice of intensive care and make the right decisions with hope and imagination.
|Keywords||imagination moral theory moral decision-making pragmatism neonatal intensive care medical ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Simone van der Burg (2009). Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):97-110.
Similar books and articles
Dennis Moberg & David F. Caldwell (2007). An Exploratory Investigation of the Effect of Ethical Culture in Activating Moral Imagination. Journal of Business Ethics 73 (2):193 - 204.
Mark A. Seabright & Marshall Schminke (2002). Immoral Imagination and Revenge in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):19 - 31.
Paul G. La Forge (2004). Cultivating Moral Imagination Through Meditation. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):15 - 29.
Paul G. La Forge (2004). Cultivating Moral Imagination Through Meditation. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):15-29.
Timothy J. Hargrave (2009). Moral Imagination, Collective Action, and the Achievement of Moral Outcomes. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (1):87-104.
Patricia H. Werhane (2002). Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):33 - 42.
Margaret G. Holland (2001). Patricia H. Werhane, Moral Imagination and Management Decision‐Making:Moral Imagination and Management Decision‐Making. Ethics 111 (4):836-837.
Mark A. Seabright (2000). The Development of Moral Imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):845-884.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2007). Imagination and Principles: An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael J. Pardales (2002). "So, How Did You Arrive at That Decision?" Connecting Moral Imagination and Moral Judgement. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):423-437.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #89,481 of 1,096,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #53,220 of 1,096,677 )
How can I increase my downloads?