Graduate studies at Western
In Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press (2011)
|Abstract||In some of the most important recent work in religious epistemology, Paul Moser (2002, 2004, 2008) develops a multifaceted reply to a prominent attack on belief in God—what we’ll call the Hiddenness Argument. This paper raises a number of worries about Moser’s novel treatment of the Hiddenness Argument. After laying out the version of that argument Moser most explicitly engages, we explain the four main elements of Moser’s reply and argue that it stands or falls with two pieces in particular—what we call the Purposively Available Evidence Argument and the Cognitive Idolatry Argument. We then show that the Cognitive Idolatry Argument fails, leaving the Purposively Available Evidence Argument as Moser’s only potentially viable objection to the Hiddenness Argument. We conclude that Moser’s treatment of the Hiddenness Argument depends crucially on some controversial epistemological claims about certain of our moral beliefs, and is thus considerably more vulnerable than many have recognized.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Oakes (2008). Life, Death, and the Hiddenness of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):155 - 160.
Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul K. Moser (eds.) (2002). Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Maitzen (2006). Divine Hiddenness and the Demographics of Theism. Religious Studies 42 (2):177-191.
J. L. Schellenberg (2008). Reply to Aijaz and Weidler on Hiddenness. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):135 - 140.
Paul K. Moser (2010). The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. Cambridge University Press.
Ted Poston & Trent Dougherty (2007). Divine Hiddenness and the Nature of Belief. Religious Studies 43 (2):183 - 198.
Trent Dougherty (2007). Divine Hiddenness and the Nature of Belief. Religious Studies 43 (2):183 - 198.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (I). Religious Studies 41 (2):201-215.
Added to index2010-02-01
Total downloads62 ( #18,324 of 739,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,328 )
How can I increase my downloads?