Graduate studies at Western
European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135 (2012)
|Abstract||Even long after their formal exclusion has come to an end, members of previously oppressed social groups often continue to face disproportionate restrictions on their freedom, as the experience of many women over the last century has shown. Working within in a framework in which freedom is understood as independence from arbitrary power, Mary Wollstonecraft provides an explanation of why such domination may persist and offers a model through which it can be addressed. Republicans rely on processes of rational public deliberation to highlight and combat oppression. However, where domination is primarily social rather than legal or political (such as where cultural attitudes, traditions and values exert an arbitrary and inhibiting force) then this defence against domination is often negated. Prejudice, she argues, ‘clouds’ people’s ability to reason and skews debate in favour of the dominant powers, thereby entrenching patterns of subjection. If they are to be independent, then, citizens require not only political rights but a platform from which to add their perspectives and interests to the background social values which govern political discussion|
|Keywords||Wollstonecarft Republicanism Slavery Non-domination Freedom Independence Feminism Voice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. J. Thompson (2013). Reconstructing Republican Freedom: A Critique of the Neo-Republican Concept of Freedom as Non-Domination. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (3):277-298.
Barbara Andrew (1994). The Psychology of Tyranny: Wollstonecraft and Woolf on the Gendered Dimension of War. Hypatia 9 (2):85 - 101.
Pamela Pansardi (2012). A Non-Normative Theory of Power and Domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):1-20.
Ruth Abbey (1999). Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia 14 (3):78-95.
Eoin Daly (2011). Non-Domination as a Primary Good: Re-Thinking the Frontiers of the 'Political' in Rawls's Political Liberalism. Jurisprudence 2 (1):37-72.
S. R. Krause (2013). Beyond Non-Domination: Agency, Inequality and the Meaning of Freedom. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):187-208.
Robert B. Talisse (2012). Impunity and Domination: A Puzzle for Republicanism. European Journal of Political Theory:1474885112463657.
Michael P. Allen (2006). Hegel Between Non-Domination and Expressive Freedom: Capabilities, Perspectives, Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):493-512.
Elizabeth A. Armstrong & Mary Bernstein (2008). Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements. Sociological Theory 26 (1):74 - 99.
Jason A. Springs (2009). "Dismantling the Master's House": Freedom as Ethical Practice in Brandom and Foucault. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (3):419-448.
Henry S. Richardson (2006). Republicanism and Democratic Injustice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
Giorel Curran (1999). Murray Bookchin and the Domination of Nature. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):59-94.
Added to index2012-01-27
Total downloads13 ( #95,599 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,186 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?