Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3):353–360 (2003)
|Abstract||The study of metaphysical possibility involves two central questions: (i) What are possible worlds? (ii) Is there an empty possible world? In looking at the first question we consider the different accounts of possible worlds-Lewisian realism, ersatzism, etc. In looking at the second question we consider the discussions of metaphysical nihilism, the modal ontological arguments, etc. In this paper I am drawing these two questions together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Stalnaker (2003). Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Reina Hayaki (2005). The Transience of Possibility. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (2):25-36.
Dominic Gregory (2006). Functionalism About Possible Worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):95 – 115.
Stig Børsen Hansen (2012). Metaphysical Nihilism and Cosmological Arguments: Some Tractarian Comments. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):223-242.
Ross P. Cameron (2006). Much Ado About Nothing: A Study of Metaphysical Nihilism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 64 (2):193-222.
D. Efird & T. Stoneham (2005). Genuine Modal Realism and the Empty World. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (1):21-37.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Modal Realism and Metaphysical Nihilism. Mind 113 (452):683-704.
Kelly Trogdon (forthcoming). Geraldine Coggins, Could There Have Been Nothing? Against Metaphysical Nihilism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophy Reviews.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,539 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,045 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?