Hypatia 26 (3):478-496 (2011)
|Abstract||Luce Irigaray's provocative vision of eros is often expressed in what Elizabeth Grosz calls “rambling and apparently disconnected” language, and nowhere in Irigaray's texts is it presented as a coherent account. With the goal of elaborating the significance of Irigaray's vision, I here set out to construct such an account. After first defining the Irigarayan erotic encounter as a paradoxical conjunction of “separation and alliance,” I then aim to show that its structure may be productively interpreted in terms of six co-present modes: (i) wonder, the affective mode; (ii) touch, the sensuous mode; (iii) transgression, the subjective mode; (iv) fluidity, the elemental mode; (v) future, the temporal mode; and (vi) threeness, the numerical mode. From this interpretation, I argue, there emerges a new understanding of the immense power of Irigarayan eros as a “sexual or carnal ethics” and as a constitutive force not only for embodied subjectivity and intersubjectivity but also for sexual difference itself|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Penelope Deutscher (2002). A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray. Cornell University Press.
Stein Haugom Olsen (2004). Modes of Interpretation and Interpretative Constraints. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):135-148.
Miri Rozmarin (2013). Living Politically: An Irigarayan Notion of Agency as a Way of Life. Hypatia 28 (3):469-482.
Allan B. Chinen (1988). Modes of Understanding and Mindfulness in Clinical Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (1).
Sabrina L. Hom (2013). Between Races and Generations: Materializing Race and Kinship in Moraga and Irigaray. Hypatia 28 (3):419-435.
Laine M. Harrington (2010). Raising Love Up to the Word": Re-Writing God as "Other" Through Irigarayan Style Ethics and Politics of the Corporeal. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press.
Ada S. Jaarsma (2003). Irigaray's. Hypatia 18 (1).
Sven Ove Hansson (2001). The Modes of Value. Philosophical Studies 104 (1):33 - 46.
Harry Wardlaw (2005). Karl Jaspers' Account of Truth as a Way Into the Discussion of Theological Truth-Claims. Sophia 44 (1):77-90.
Ada S. Jaarsma (2003). Irigaray's to Be Two: The Problem of Evil and the Plasticity of Incarnation. Hypatia 18 (1):44 - 62.
Evelien Geerts, Forcefully Subverting or Reinforcing Dichotomies? Elizabeth Grosz‟s Feminist Rereading of Charles Darwin, Via the Perspectives of Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray.
Timothy Fuller (2009). Oakeshott on the Character of Religious Experience: Need There Be a Conflict Between Science and Religion? Zygon 44 (1):153-167.
M. F. Simone Roberts (2010). A Poetics of Being-Two: Irigaray's Ethics and Post-Symbolist Poetry. Lexington Books.
Jill Gordon (2005). Eros in Plato's Timaeus. Epoché 9 (2):255-278.
Added to index2011-03-31
Total downloads25 ( #55,665 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?