David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
It is widely believed that cost-sharing - charging a subsidized, positive price - for a health product is necessary to avoid wasting resources on those who will not use or do not need the product. We explore this argument in the context of a field experiment in Kenya, in which we randomized the price at which pregnant women could buy long lasting anti-malarial insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) at prenatal clinics. We find no evidence that cost-sharing reduces wastage on those that will not use the product: women who received free ITNs are not less likely to use them than those who paid subsidized positive prices. We also find no evidence that cost-sharing induces selection of women who need the net more: those who pay higher prices appear no sicker than the prenatal clients in the control group in terms of measured anemia (an important indicator of malaria). Cost-sharing does, however, considerably dampen demand. We find that uptake drops by 75 percent when the price of ITNs increases from 0 to $0.75, the price at which ITNs are currently sold to pregnant women in Kenya. We combine our estimates in a cost-effectiveness analysis of ITN prices on infant mortality that incorporates both private and social returns to ITN usage. Overall, given the large positive externality associated with widespread usage of insecticide-treated nets, our results suggest that free distribution to pregnant women is both more effective and more cost-effective than cost-sharing.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
G. Alexander, Mark Hall & John Lantos (2006). Rethinking Professional Ethics in the Cost-Sharing Era. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):W17-W22.
Kjell Arne Johansson & Ole Frithjof Norheim (2011). Problems With Prioritization: Exploring Ethical Solutions to Inequalities in HIV Care. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):32-40.
Giacomo Bonanno (1998). Intensity of Competition and the Choice Between Product and Process Innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (4):495-510.
Carla Saenz (2011). Affordability of Health Care: A Gender-Related Problem and a Gender-Responsive Solution. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):144-153.
Vivekananda Mukherjee & Shyama V. Ramani (2011). R&D Cooperation in Emerging Industries, Asymmetric Innovative Capabilities and Rationale for Technology Parks. Theory and Decision 71 (3):373-394.
Joan E. Sieber & Bruce E. Trumbo (1995). (Not) Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Citation of Data Sets. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):11-20.
John Ziker (2004). Nonmarket Cooperation in the Indigenous Food Economy of Taimyr, Arctic Russia: Evidence for Control and Benefit. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):571-571.
Amotz Zahavi (2004). The Details of Food-Sharing Interactions – Their Cost in Social Prestige. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):570-571.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #217,583 of 1,139,993 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,139,993 )
How can I increase my downloads?