David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (3):221-253 (1999)
Generics and frequency statements are puzzling phenomena: they are lawlike, yet contingent. They may be true even in the absence of any supporting instances, and extending the size of their domain does not change their truth conditions. Generics and frequency statements are parametric on time, but not on possible worlds; they cannot be applied to temporary generalizations, and yet are contingent. These constructions require a regular distribution of events along the time axis. Truth judgments of generics vary considerably across speakers, whereas truth judgments of frequency statements are much more uniform. A generic may be false even if the vast majority of individuals in its domain satisfy the predicated property, whereas a frequency statement using, e.g., usually would be true. This paper argues that all these seemingly unrelated puzzles have a single underlying cause: generics and frequency statements express probability judgments, and these, in turn, are interpreted as statements of hypothetical relative frequency.
|Keywords||Linguistics Philosophy of Language Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistics Semantics Syntax|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bernard Nickel (2008). Generics and the Ways of Normality. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (6):629-648.
Sarah‐Jane Leslie (2015). “Hillary Clinton is the Only Man in the Obama Administration”: Dual Character Concepts, Generics, and Gender. Analytic Philosophy 56 (2):111-141.
Kai-Yuan Cheng (2011). A New Look at the Problem of Rule-Following: A Generic Perspective. Philosophical Studies 155 (1):1 - 21.
Ashwini Deo (2009). Unifying the Imperfective and the Progressive: Partitions as Quantificational Domains. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (5):475-521.
B. Nickel (2010). Generic Comparisons. Journal of Semantics 27 (2):207-242.
Similar books and articles
Richard E. Neapolitan (1992). A Limiting Frequency Approach to Probability Based on the Weak Law of Large Numbers. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):389-407.
Ariel Cohen (2004). Generics and Mental Representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (5):529-556.
Louis Vervoort, The Concept of Probability in Physics: An Analytic Version of von Mises’ Interpretation.
Sarah-Jane Leslie (2008). Generics: Cognition and Acquisition. Philosophical Review 117 (1):1-47.
Andrei Cimpian, Amanda C. Brandone & Susan A. Gelman (2010). Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1452-1482.
Ariel Cohen (2004). Existential Generics. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (2):137-168.
John Meixner (1987). Frequencies and Possibility. Philosophy Research Archives 13:73-77.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads69 ( #58,379 of 1,789,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #75,392 of 1,789,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?