David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Paideia (Special Aristotle Edition):75-85 (1978)
Aristotle's claim in Metaphysics Z.6 that "each substance is the same as its essence" has long puzzled commentators. For it seems to conflict with two other Aristotelian theses: (1) primary substances are individuals (e.g., Socrates and Callias), and (2) essences are universals (e.g., Man and Horse). Three traditional solutions to this difficulty are considered and rejected. Instead, to make the Z.6 equation consistent with (1) and (2), I propose that it be interpreted to be making something other than a straightforward identity claim. Callias is the same as his essence in the sense that to be identical to Callias is to be the same man as Callias (where Man is the essence of Callias). In general, x is identical to y if, and only if, x and y are the same E (where E specifies the "what it is to be" for x, i.e., the essence of x). So each of Socrates and Callias is the same as his essence, and Man is that essence, but Socrates and Callias are not identical, for they are not the same man.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kit Fine (1994). A Puzzle Concerning Matter and Form. In T. Scaltsas, David Charles & Mary Louise Gill (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. 13--40.
S. Marc Cohen (1992). Substance and Essence in Aristotle. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 101:838-40.
Norman O. Dahl (1997). Two Kinds of Essence in Aristotle: A Pale Man is Not the Same as His Essence. Philosophical Review 106 (2):233-265.
Alvin Plantinga (1979). De Essentia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 7:101-121.
Charlotte Witt (1989). Substance and Essence in Aristotle: An Interpretation of Metaphysics Vii-Ix. Cornell University Press.
Dezhi Duan (2007). Aquinas' Transcendences to Aristotle in the Doctrine of Essence. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):572-582.
Hector Ferreiro (2007). La Absolutización de la Esencia Como Axioma Fundamental de la Metafísica Tomista. Patristica Et Mediaevalia 28:83-97.
Kathrin Koslicki (2012). Essence, Necessity, and Explanation. In Tuomas E. Tahko (ed.), Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. 187--206.
Shiying Zhang (2009). The Double Meanings of “Essence”: The Natural and Humane Sciences — a Tentative Linkage of Hegel, Dilthey, and Husserl. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):143-155.
David Peroutka Ocd (2007). Suárezova nauka o receptivních potencích a její ohlas u R. Arriagy. Studia Neoaristotelica 4 (1):36-77.
Tuomas E. Tahko (2013). Metaphysics as the First Philosophy. In Edward Feser (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Makoto Ozaki (2007). On the Essence of Substance as the Individual. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:185-189.
Sherry Deveaux (2003). The Divine Essence and the Conception of God in Spinoza. Synthese 135 (3):329 - 338.
Added to index2011-02-09
Total downloads52 ( #34,779 of 1,139,992 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #39,122 of 1,139,992 )
How can I increase my downloads?