David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
As part of the South Carolina Law Review's symposium on the Roberts Court and Equal Protection, this essay looks at Justice Kennedy's sex discrimination jurisprudence. With the new Court, it's natural to be concerned with how the two new Justices might vote in upcoming sex discrimination cases. However, in this essay, I assume what has been the case so far from Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito - that they are reliable votes joining Justices Scalia and Thomas on the Court's more conservative wing. The Justice most people should focus on now is Justice Kennedy, the new median Justice now that Justice O'Connor has retired. This essay seeks to analyze Justice Kennedy's sex discrimination jurisprudence and draw conclusions about his thoughts on sex and gender. First, it reviews the cases involving sex discrimination that Justice Kennedy has participated in while on the Court and shows that he has been a fairly consistent vote against sex discrimination claims. Second, it analyzes Justice Kennedy's votes and opinions in sex discrimination cases and attempt to summarize his views. Finally, the essay evaluates Justice Kennedy's conceptions of gender in his opinions and votes. The essay concludes that Justice Kennedy's new role as median Justice is troubling for sex equality jurisprudence generally and constitutional sex discrimination cases specifically, as Justice Kennedy has shown a tendency, in the many cases arising in the parent/child context, to adhere to traditional and paternalistic gender roles.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Colin Patrick Farrelly (2005). Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):91-99.
Helen J. Knowles, Clerkish Control of Recent Supreme Court Opinions? A Case Study of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in Gonzales Vs. Carhart.
Michael J. Sandel (ed.) (2007). Justice: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
Bernard G. Prusak (2005). The Ancients, the Moderns, and the Court. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:189-200.
Julie M. Cheslik, Andrea McMurtry & Kristin Underwood, Supreme Court Report 2006-2007: Closing of the Courthouse Doors?
Rochelle Bobroff, Section 1983 and Preemption: Alternative Means of Court Access for Safety Net Statutes.
Sara Goering (2002). Beyond the Medical Model? Disability, Formal Justice, and the Exception for the "Profoundly Impaired&Quot. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):373-388.
Chelsea Luthringer (2000). So What is Justice Anyway? Rosen Pub. Group.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #682,359 of 1,796,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,533 of 1,796,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?