Moral Emotions and Unethical Bargaining: The Differential Effects of Empathy and Perspective Taking in Deterring Deceitful Negotiation [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):569-579 (2010)
Two correlational studies tested whether personality differences in empathy and perspective taking differentially relate to disapproval of unethical negotiation strategies, such as lies and bribes. Across both studies, empathy, but not perspective taking, discouraged attacking opponents' networks, misrepresentation, inappropriate information gathering, and feigning emotions to manipulate opponents. These results suggest that unethical bargaining is more likely to be deterred by empathy than by perspective taking. Study 2 also tested whether individual differences in guilt proneness and shame proneness inhibited the endorsement of unethical bargaining tactics. Guilt proneness predicted disapproval of false promises and misrepresentation. Empathy did not predict disapproval of false promises when guilt proneness was included in the analysis. The comparatively private nature of the sin of false promises suggests that private ethical breaches are more likely to be deterred by anticipated guilt, while ethical breaches with clear interpersonal consequences are more likely to be deterred by empathy.
|Keywords||negotiation bargaining unethical behavior empathy perspective taking guilt shame SINS II scale|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Chase E. Thiel, Zhanna Bagdasarov, Lauren Harkrider, James F. Johnson & Michael D. Mumford (2012). Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (1):49-64.
Mara Olekalns, Carol T. Kulik & Lin Chew (2014). Sweet Little Lies: Social Context and the Use of Deception in Negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics 120 (1):13-26.
Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan (2014). Feelings That Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (1):117-134.
Majid Ghorbani, Yuan Liao, Sinan Çayköylü & Masud Chand (2013). Guilt, Shame, and Reparative Behavior: The Effect of Psychological Proximity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):311-323.
Mara Olekalns, Christopher J. Horan & Philip L. Smith (2014). Maybe It’s Right, Maybe It’s Wrong: Structural and Social Determinants of Deception in Negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics 122 (1):89-102.
Similar books and articles
Lisa Kuhmerker (1975). Learning to Care‐‐The Development of Empathy. Journal of Moral Education 5 (1):25-33.
Justin Tiwald (2011). Sympathy and Perspective-Taking in Confucian Ethics. Philosophy Compass 6 (10):663-674.
Fritz Breithaupt (2012). A Three-Person Model of Empathy. Emotion Review 4 (1):84-91.
Karsten R. Stueber (2011). Imagination, Empathy, and Moral Deliberation: The Case of Imaginative Resistence. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):156-180.
Doris Bischof-Köhler (2012). Empathy and Self-Recognition in Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic Perspective. Emotion Revies 4 (1):40-48.
Julian Paul Keenan & Mark A. Wheeler (2001). Elucidation of the Brain Correlates of Cognitive Empathy and Self-Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):40-41.
Amy Coplan (2011). Will the Real Empathy Please Stand Up? A Case for a Narrow Conceptualization. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):40-65.
Jesse Prinz (2011). Against Empathy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):214-233.
Added to index2009-12-21
Total downloads35 ( #112,332 of 1,793,171 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,804 of 1,793,171 )
How can I increase my downloads?