Medical Marijuana, Compassionate Use, and Public Policy: Expert Opinion or Vox Populi ?

Hastings Center Report 36 (3):19-22 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.1353/hcr.2006.0037

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Vox populi.George Boas - 1969 - Baltimore,: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Vox populi, vox Dei.G. A. Tawney - 1918 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 15 (3):64-70.
Kierkegaard:Vox Populi, Vox Dei.Husain Sarkar - 1999 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):253-279.
Medical Marijuana 2010: It's Time to Fix the Regulatory Vacuum.Peter J. Cohen - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):654-666.
Employment and Public Policy Issues Surrounding Medical Marijuana in the Workplace.Jeffrey A. Mello - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):659-666.
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (1):57-79.
Revisiting “the Voice of the People”: An Evaluation of the Claims and Consequences of Deliberative Polling.Laurel S. Gleason - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):371-392.
Vox Populi. [REVIEW]C. M. R. - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 24 (2):335-336.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.
Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science.Roger M. Cooke (ed.) - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ignorant armies: The state, the public, and the making of foreign policy.Earl C. Ravenal - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):327-374.
Conflicts of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy.Don A. Moore (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
What wrongdoers deserve: the moral reasoning behind responses to misconduct.R. Murray Thomas - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. Edited by Ann Diver-Stamnes.
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
60 (#262,432)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references