David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):45-53 (2013)
We investigated the relationship between guilt proneness and counterproductive work behavior (CWB) using a diverse sample of employed adults working in a variety of different industries at various levels in their organizations. CWB refers to behaviors that harm or are intended to harm organizations or people in organizations. Guilt proneness is a personality trait characterized by a predisposition to experience negative feelings about personal wrongdoing. CWB was engaged in less frequently by individuals high in guilt proneness compared to those low in guilt proneness, controlling for other known correlates of CWB. CWB was also predicted by gender, age, intention to turnover, interpersonal conflict at work, and negative affect at work. Given the detrimental impact of CWB on people and organizations, it may be wise for employers to consider guilt proneness when making hiring decisions
|Keywords||Counterproductive work behavior Guilt proneness Unethical behavior Morality Personality Individual differences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Taya R. Cohen (2010). Moral Emotions and Unethical Bargaining: The Differential Effects of Empathy and Perspective Taking in Deterring Deceitful Negotiation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4):569 - 579.
Christian Miller (2011). Guilt, Embarrassment, and Global Character Traits Associated with Helping. In Thom Brooks (ed.), New Waves in Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Christian Miller (2010). Guilt and Helping. International Journal of Ethics 6 (2/3):231-252.
Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell, Moral Rules, the Moral Sentiments, and Behavior: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System.
Margaret Gilbert (2002). Collective Guilt and Collective Guilt Feelings. Journal of Ethics 6 (2):115-143.
Gale M. Lucas & James Friedrich (2005). Individual Differences in Workplace Deviance and Integrity as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):15 – 35.
Gilbert Harman (2009). Guilt-Free Morality. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:203-14.
Kevin Uttich & Tania Lombrozo (2010). Norms Inform Mental State Ascriptions: A Rational Explanation for the Side-Effect Effect. Cognition 116 (1):87–100.
Wolfram Eberhard (1967). Guilt and Sin in Traditional China. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Deanne N. Hartog & Frank D. Belschak (2012). Work Engagement and Machiavellianism in the Ethical Leadership Process. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (1):35-47.
Julien A. Deonna & Fabrice Teroni (2008). Differentiating Shame From Guilt. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (4):1063-1400..
Man Kit Chang (1998). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1825-1834.
Added to index2012-04-26
Total downloads7 ( #209,687 of 1,410,464 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,464 )
How can I increase my downloads?