David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):113-136 (1983)
into treatment decisions is viewed as pernicious by some who claim that these presuppose the Nazi position that those who are ‘devoid of value’ must be exterminated. ‘Quality of life’ judgments are said to deny the equal value of human beings and to assume that some lives are not ‘worthy to be lived’. It is argued that the analogy misconstrues the senses of ‘value’ and ‘quality’ employed by Naziism and a ‘quality of life’ position. This leads the analogizers incorrectly to claim that both views assimilate the value of human beings to the value of their condition. A ‘quality of life’ position is grounded in recognition of the logical priority of the value of human beings as self-reflective evaluators and agents, which is a matter of kind, not degree. The ‘quality of life’ is explicated in terms of the standards of well-being of individuals, which are derived from their basic human needs and their individual priorities and goals. The use of ‘quality of life’ judgments is morally required to ensure that considerations of justice and individual autonomy govern treatment decisions. The purported analogy misconstrues the views of both the Nazi position and a ‘quality of life’ position and so is seriously misdirected. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard E. McDaniel (1992). The Duty to Promote Personal Well-Being: A Response to “Nutrition and Hydration: Moral Considerations,” a Statement by the Catholic Bishops of Pennsylvania. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 4 (5):299-304.
Similar books and articles
Jerry Wurf (1982). Labor's View of Quality of Working Life Programs. Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):131 - 137.
Michael A. Hitt, Orley M. Amos & Larkin Warner (1983). Social Factors and Company Location Decisions: Technology, Quality of Life and Quality of Work Life Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 2 (2):89 - 98.
G. Radick (2001). A Critique of Kitcher on Eugenic Reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):741-751.
Matti Häyry (1991). Measuring the Quality of Life: Why, How and What? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Peter Sondøe (1999). Quality of Life - Three Competing Views. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):11-23.
Steve F. Sapontzis (1995). On Exploiting Inferiors. Between the Species 11 (1-2):1--24.
Michael Quante (2005). Quality of Life Assessment and Human Dignity: Against the Incompatibility-Assumption. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):168-180.
Raphael Cohen-Almagor & Merav Shmueli (2000). Can Life Be Evaluated? The Jewish Halachic Approach Vs. The Quality of Life Approach in Medical Ethics: A Critical View. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (2):117-137.
Helga Kuhse (1987). The Sanctity-of-Life Doctrine in Medicine: A Critique. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-14
Total downloads10 ( #324,492 of 1,792,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,717 of 1,792,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?