Should natural-language definitions be insulated from, or interactive with, one another in sentence composition?
Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 72 (2-3):177 - 197 (1993)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andreas Kemmerling, Comments on Paul Horwich's "On the Alleged Normative Import of Implicit Definitions" (Workshop Implicit Definitions and A Priori Knowledge, GAP 6, Berlin, September 2006). [REVIEW]
Andrea Nye (1992). Frege's Metaphors. Hypatia 7 (2):18 - 39.
Paul Pietrowski (2002). Function and Concatenation. In Georg Peter & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford University Press.
Jason Stanley (2003). Modality and What is Said. In John Hawthorne (ed.), Language and Mind. Blackwell.
Alistair Knott (2003). Do Sensorimotor Processes Have Reflexes in Sentence Syntax as Well as Sentence Semantics? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):294-295.
Gabriel Sandu (1994). Some Aspects of Negation in English. Synthese 99 (3):345 - 360.
Berit Brogaard, Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox, by Douglas Patterson. Philosopher's Digest.
Ernesto Napoli (2006). Negation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):233-252.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?