David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (02):25- (1989)
There are two principal philosophical conceptions of socialism, corresponding to two interpretations of the notion of a rational society. The first conception corresponds to an instrumental view of social rationality. Captured by the image of socialism as “one big workshop,” the instrumental view holds that social ownership of the means of production is rational because it promotes the optimal development of the productive forces. Social ownership is optimal because it eliminates the costs of coordination imposed by the conduct of economic activities in formally independent enterprises, and, more generally, overcomes fetters on development that result from the control of resources by individuals whose particular interests imperfectly correspond to a general interest in productive advance
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nien-hê Hsieh (2008). Survey Article: Justice in Production. Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (1):72–100.
Pierre-Yves Néron (2010). Business and the Polis: What Does It Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):333-352.
Silvia Sacchetti (2015). Inclusive and Exclusive Social Preferences: A Deweyan Framework to Explain Governance Heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (3):473-485.
Jeffrey Moriarty (2010). Participation in the Workplace: Are Employees Special? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (3):373 - 384.
Nien-hê Hsieh (2007). Managers, Workers, and Authority. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):347 - 357.
Similar books and articles
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Philip Pettit (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris 17 (1):52-65.
Robert B. Talisse (2004). Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy? Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
Gerald Gaus (2008). The (Severe) Limits of Deliberative Democracy as the Basis for Political Choice. Theoria 55 (117):26-53.
C. S. King (2013). Economic Theories of Democratic Legitimacy and the Normative Role of an Ideal Consensus. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):156-178.
John S. Dryzek (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2):218 - 242.
Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.
John Parkinson (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. OUP Oxford.
Bashir Bashir (2012). Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (2):127-143.
Charles Blattberg (2003). Patriotic, Not Deliberative, Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):155-174.
Philip Pettit (2001). Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma. Noûs 35 (s1):268-299.
Robert B. Talisse (2005). Deliberativist Responses to Activist Challenges: A Continuation of Young’s Dialectic. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (4):423-444.
Gregory F. Pappas (spring 2008). "John Dewey and the Contemporary 'Deliberative Turn' in Political Theory," Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 , 71-78. [REVIEW] Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 (Spring 2008), 71-78 30:71-78.
William Smith (2004). Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads94 ( #34,506 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #118,705 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?