Graduate studies at Western
In G. Ernst, J. Steinbrenner & O. Scholz (eds.), From Logic to Art: Themes from Nelson Goodman. Ontos (2009)
|Abstract||I argue that Goodman’s philosophy should not be characterised in opposition to the philosophy of the logical empiricists, but is more fruitfully interpreted as a continuation of their philosophical programme. In particular, understanding Goodman’s philosophy as a continuation of the ideal language tradition makes explicable how a radical ontological relativist could be such a staunch nominalist at the same time.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dirk Koppelberg (1993). Should We Replace Knowledge by Understanding? — A Comment on Elgin and Goodman's Reconception of Epistemology. Synthese 95 (1):119 - 128.
Mark Textor (2008). Samples as Symbols. Ratio 21 (3):344-359.
Catherine Z. Elgin (ed.) (1997). Nominalism, Constructivism, and Relativism in the Work of Nelson Goodman. Garland Pub..
Vladan Djordjevic (2012). Goodman's Only World. In Majda Trobok, Nenad Miscevic & Berislav Zarnic (eds.), Between Logic and Reality: Modeling Inference, Action and Understanding. Springer.
Russell B. Goodman (1990). American Philosophy and the Romantic Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Branden Fitelson (2008). Goodman's "New Riddle". Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (6):613 - 643.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #49,855 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #8,405 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?