David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):396-401 (2009)
abstract Intuitively, all killings are equally wrong, no matter how old one's victim. In this paper we defend this claim — The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis — against a challenge presented by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Lippert-Rasmussen shows The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis to be incompatible with two further theses: The Unequal Wrongness of Renderings Unconscious Thesis and The Equivalence Thesis. Lippert-Rasmussen argues that, of the three, The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis is the least defensible. He suggests that the most convincing considerations apparently in favour of the Equal Wrongness thesis may be satisfied just as well if we adopt an alternative principle, a 'Prioritarian View' about the wrongness of killing. We argue that The Prioritarian View does not resolve the trilemma: it too is inconsistent with the other two theses. Instead, we argue, the most plausible resolution of the trilemma involves a rejection, rather, of The Unequal Wrongness of Renderings Unconscious Thesis. In its place, we offer an attractive principle that is compatible with both The Equal Wrongness of Killings Thesis as well as The Equivalence Thesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (1999). Life-Prolonging Killings and Their Relevance to Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.
Frances Howard-Snyder & Alastair Norcross (1993). A Consequentialist Case for Rejecting the Right. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:109-125.
Mikel Burley (2010). Epicurus, Death, and the Wrongness of Killing. Inquiry 53 (1):68-86.
Andrew C. Khoury (2011). Blameworthiness and Wrongness. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):135-146.
Gabriel Palmer-Fernández (2000). Innocence in War. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):161-174.
Nils Holtug (2011). Killing and the Time-Relative Interest Account. Journal of Ethics 15 (3):169-189.
Peter Singer (1979). Killing Humans and Killing Animals. Inquiry 22 (1-4):145 – 156.
Dan Moller (2006). Killing and Dying. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):235-247.
Carlos Soto (2013). Killing, Wrongness, and Equality. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):543-559.
Added to index2009-06-12
Total downloads34 ( #103,188 of 1,780,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #122,348 of 1,780,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?