What's mine is mine; what's yours is mine: Private ownership of icts as a threat to transparency [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):123-131 (2009)
In the face of ubiquitous information communication technology, the presence of blogs, personal websites, and public message boards give the illusion of uncensored criticism and discussion of the ethical implications of business activities. However, little attention has been paid to the limitations on free speech posed by the control of access to the Internet by private entities, enabling them to censor content that is deemed critical of corporate or public policy. The premise of this research is that transparency alone will not achieve the desired results if ICT is used in a one way system, controlled by the provider of information. Stakeholders must have an avenue using the same technology to respond to and interact with the information. We propose a model that imposes on corporations a public trust, requiring these gatekeepers of communication technology to preserve individual rights to criticism and review
|Keywords||Internet access Privatization Public trust Transparency|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sandra Waddock (2004). Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):313-327.
Antonio Tencati, Francesco Perrini & Stefano Pogutz (2004). New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):173-190.
Hens Runhaar & Helene Lafferty (2009). Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the Un Global Compact to Csr Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4):479 - 495.
Linda O'Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (4):745-758.
Kristen Bell DeTienne & Lee W. Lewis (2005). The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (4):359 - 376.
Citations of this work BETA
Antonino Vaccaro & Alejo José G. Sison (2011). Transparency in Business: The Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching and the “Caritas in Veritate”. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):17-27.
Similar books and articles
Anne O'Byrne (1999). Being Mine. Research in Phenomenology 29 (1):239-248.
John King-Farlow (1964). The Concept of 'Mine'. Inquiry 7 (1-4):268 – 276.
S. Cunningham, D. Turk, L. MacdonaLd & C. NeilmaCrae (2008). Yours or Mine? Ownership and Memory. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):312-318.
Herbert Morris (ed.) (1961). Freedom and Responsibility: Readings in Philosophy and Law. Stanford University Press.
Robert Frodeman (2001). Corrosive Effects: Environmental Ethics and the Metaphysics of Acid Mine Drainage. Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):156-172.
Timothy Schroeder (2007). A Recipe for Concept Similarity. Mind and Language 22 (1):68-91.
Isam Alawneh, Modeling of the Backscatter Behaviour of Typical Antipersonnel Mines by Computer Simulations and Expertimental Tests.
John King-Farlow (1969). I. 'Mine' and the Family of Human Imaginings. Inquiry 12 (1-4):225 – 236.
Leon Litwinski (1947). The Psychology of "Mine". Philosophy 22 (83):240 - 251.
Added to index2009-05-09
Total downloads20 ( #142,353 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?