Graduate studies at Western
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):479-513 (2007)
|Abstract||Two normative principles of toleration are offered, one individual-regarding, the other group-regarding. The first is John Stuart Mill’s harm principle; the other is “Principle T,” meant to be the harm principle writ large. It is argued that the state should tolerate autonomous sacrifices of autonomy, including instances where an individual rationally chooses to be enslaved, lobotomized, or killed. Consistent with that, it is argued that the state should tolerate internal restrictions within minority groups even where these prevent autonomy promotion of members of the group. Finally, it is argued that toleration excludes external protections of minority groups.|
|Keywords||toleration cultures Mill, John Stuart harm principle liberalism autonomy libertarian|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martha C. Nussbaum (2006). Radical Evil in the Lockean State: The Neglect of the Political Emotions. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):159-178.
Blain Neufeld (2005). Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
George Crowder (2007). Two Concepts of Liberal Pluralism. Political Theory 35 (2):121 - 146.
Alan E. Fuchs (2001). Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Cristian Lupu (2007). Tolerating Nonliberal States: Human Rights as a Grounding Principle? Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):223 – 235.
Ted Honderich (1967). Mill on Liberty. Inquiry 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,582 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,347 )
How can I increase my downloads?