Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):111-130 (1998)
|Abstract||: Genetics professionals have been reluctant to test children for adult-onset conditions because they believe this would create psychosocial harm to children not counterbalanced by significant benefits. An additional concern they express is that such testing would violate the autonomy of these children as adults. Yet weighing the harms and benefits of such testing results in a draw, with no substantial harms proven. Moreover, such testing can enhance, rather than violate the adult autonomy of these children. In deciding whether to proceed with predictive testing of children, parents, mature children, and health care professionals should consider a complex of factors relevant to the particular child. The importance of these factors will vary depending on the condition at issue, the age and stage of development of the child, family dynamics, and the concerns, values, and objectives of the parents and mature child. The final decision whether to test a child for an adult-onset condition should rest with the parents and the mature child.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Gill, Picu Prometheus: Ethical Issues in the Treatment of Very Sick Children in Paediatric Intensive Care.
Stephen Kershnar (2001). The Moral Status of Harmless Adult-Child Sex. Public Affairs Quarterly 15 (2):111--132.
Charles Zola (2001). Geriatric Filial Piety. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):185-203.
P. J. Malpas (2006). Why Tell Asymptomatic Children of the Risk of an Adult-Onset Disease in the Family but Not Test Them for It? Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):639-642.
John Davis (2008). Selecting Potential Children and Unconditional Parental Love. Bioethics 22 (5):258–268.
P. J. Malpas (2008). Predictive Genetic Testing of Children for Adult-Onset Diseases and Psychological Harm. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):275-278.
Lainie Friedman Ross (2002). Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2007). Using the Best Interests Standard to Decide Whether to Test Children for Untreatable, Late-Onset Genetic Diseases. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):375 – 394.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,640 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?