Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4):247-265 (2001)
|Abstract||Traditional approaches to computer ethics regard computers as tools, andfocus, therefore, on the ethics of their use. Alternatively, computer ethicsmight instead be understood as a study of the ethics of computationalagents, exploring, for example, the different characteristics and behaviorsthat might benefit such an agent in accomplishing its goals. In this paper,I identify a list of characteristics of computational agents that facilitatetheir pursuit of their end, and claim that these characteristics can beunderstood as virtues within a framework of virtue ethics. This frameworkincludes four broad categories – agentive, social, environmental, and moral– each of which can be understood as a spectrum of virtues rangingbetween two extreme subcategories. Although the use of a virtue frameworkis metaphorical rather than literal, I argue that by providing a frameworkfor identifying and critiquing assumptions about what a `good' computer is,a study of android arete provides focus and direction to the developmentof future computational agents.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Meilaender & Gilbert Meilander (1983). Josef Pieper: Explorations in the Thought of a Philosopher of Virtue. Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (1):114 - 134.
Charles J. List (2005). The Virtues of Wild Leisure. Environmental Ethics 27 (4):355-373.
Aaron Quinn (2007). Moral Virtues for Journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2 & 3):168 – 186.
Heather Battaly (2010). Introduction: Virtue and Vice. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):1-21.
Stuart S. Glennan (1995). Computationalism and the Problem of Other Minds. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):375-88.
Hektor K. T. Yan (2009). A Paradox of Virtue: The Daodejing on Virtue and Moral Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 59 (2):pp. 173-187.
Robert Hull (2005). All About EVE: A Report on Environmental Virtue Ethics Today. Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):89-110.
Professor Adam Morton (2004). Epistemic Virtues, Metavirtues, and Computational Complexity. Noûs 38 (3):481-502.
Adam Morton (2004). Epistemic Virtues, Metavirtues, and Computational Complexity. Noûs 38 (3):481–502.
Brian Treanor (forthcoming). Environmentalism and Public Virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #74,686 of 549,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?